Jump to content
Melbourne Football

Melbourne City F.C. Match Statistics


n i k o
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, Tommykins said:

I've been lookig for a way to describe how well Eugene had played this year as a bit of a mea culpa , as I was definitely in the category of people who thought it was just a matter of time until Birighitti took his spot. I was very wrong.

Nice work mate.

Love seeing statistics! Fuck I have an exciting life

  • Like 2
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Imtellingyou said:

Nice work. What statistics don't say is that Galekovic lost 9kg  as result of working with Kalac. He still had to do a lot and well despite good Bart/Delbridge pairing. 

You mean Joyce right? Kalac joined in mid June (IIRC) and EG was looking slim in our early preseason and cup games, which would be a very short time for a professional player to drop a huge amount of weight.

This of course takes nothing away from Kalac who is an immense improvement on Joey D (who IMO is responsible for Redmayne progressively getting worse when he played for us).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, malloy said:

You mean Joyce right? Kalac joined in mid June (IIRC) and EG was looking slim in our early preseason and cup games, which would be a very short time for a professional player to drop a huge amount of weight.

This of course takes nothing away from Kalac who is an immense improvement on Joey D (who IMO is responsible for Redmayne progressively getting worse when he played for us).

That's when it was announced. https://www.goal.com/en-au/news/the-covert-agent-zeljko-kalac-melbourne-city-aleague/xdorqdzu3q2t1741wj74mgw4w

It may have been Van Stratten who got the weight off Galekovic.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

image.thumb.png.899135630575d10df0de11462ecfab0b.png

After another week of listening to people shout the ever imaginative "shoot farken" from the terrace, I thought I'd take a look and see how our team actually does compared to the rest of the league. The word I'm looking for here is "outlier"

Basically there's three other groups of teams in the league at the moment.

"On the break" teams - WEL, PER and ADL. Not particularly looking to play the ball around a heck of a lot in the final third, and don't get the ball into the box a hell of a lot, but do tend to score goals when they go forward (I have excluded CCM from here as they're trying their hardest but their hardest is still not very good).

"Control" teams - MVC, SFC and NEW. All make a large number of passes in the final third per game and end up having a large number of balls played into the box and score a lot of goals, excluding Newcastle (semi-interestingly, Newcastle seem to plot with the good teams regardless depending on what metric you use to define that, but they just haven't got the results this year, Sunday was another example of this, even with 10 men they looked super dangerous for the second half against City)

"Sooner the better" teams - BRI and WSW. Both tend to get the ball into the box a lot (more than any top 6 side), but don't actually score a lot, the antithesis to City.

"Whatever the hell Melbourne City are doing" - Making more attacking third passes per game (by about 15 per game), but only CCM have fewer entries to the box per game than we do. Yikes. 

Melbourne City's monopoly on possession, but lack of penetration into the box is meant to lead to fewer chances, but considerably better chances. You can see how this works in theory, but in practice the front three hasn't been able to really make this come to fruition. 

 

PPG_PPS.gif.a7369d41d851a23bf4921803e7147f65.gif

This really sums it up for me - in terms of passes per shot, we're the highest, but not super far away from MVC, PER and SFC. But in terms of Passes per goal we have a much higher overall value. (I'm stuffing around with animations in statistics for work and just getting my head around the implementation, so sorry if you've all just got sick from this graphic)

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Tommykins said:

 

PPG_PPS.gif.a7369d41d851a23bf4921803e7147f65.gif

This really sums it up for me - in terms of passes per shot, we're the highest, but not super far away from MVC, PER and SFC. But in terms of Passes per goal we have a much higher overall value. (I'm stuffing around with animations in statistics for work and just getting my head around the implementation, so sorry if you've all just got sick from this graphic)

Is that graph an animation of each round of the season so far?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, haz said:

Is that graph an animation of each round of the season so far?

I'd imagine it would be staggered animation if that was the case, unless each team continues to show the same pattern of passes per shot from game to game 

Edited by n i k o
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, haz said:

Is that graph an animation of each round of the season so far?

My bad - I was messing around to try and show that if you look at it from a 1D stand point (Just passes per shot) we're doing quite well, but if you put it into the context of passes per goal and passes per shot, we're fairly profligate in front of goal with possession. 

Just now, n i k o said:

I'd imagine it would be staggered animation if that was the case, unless each team continues to show the same pattern of passes per shot

Yep, unfortunately I don't have the game by game data - only the total statistics up to this point in the year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Tommykins said:

My bad - I was messing around to try and show that if you look at it from a 1D stand point (Just passes per shot) we're doing quite well, but if you put it into the context of passes per goal and passes per shot, we're fairly profligate in front of goal with possession. 

Yep, unfortunately I don't have the game by game data - only the total statistics up to this point in the year.

I think the HAL site should have game stats. If not the A-League Live app (3rd party) keeps good data for each game

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, haz said:

I think the HAL site should have game stats. If not the A-League Live app (3rd party) keeps good data for each game

I like the stats collected here

https://www.foxsports.com.au/football/a-league/stats/teams

Unfortunately the A-League site and the A-League Live app don't quite have the same

https://www.a-league.com.au/match/melbourne-city-fc-v-newcastle-jets-a-league-06-01-2019/1002880#!/stats

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, JMSTEP123 said:

Bloody great work from our stats man @Tommykins solid work bloke.

Stats are a labour of love. I am a teacher and stats are my day to day go to. Football is also a stats game, though, as in teaching, only seeing the stats dehumanises the story. Can only tell us one part of it. Your insights are spot on mate, well done. Stats dont lie

Agree. Football is also about entertainment, excitement, passion, loyalty, love - a whole range of human emotions. And I don't think we're doing too well there.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, jw1739 said:

Agree. Football is also about entertainment, excitement, passion, loyalty, love - a whole range of human emotions. And I don't think we're doing too well there.

Not wrong. Something as simple as only seeing the outcome cannot allow you to infer how the game yesterday unfolded. 

Lacklustre to say the least in the 2nd half. Having said that, important 3 points if we are to make a stab at the top of the table come end of season. Even the Mooy era would have seen Newcastle score and equalise yesterday. I remember it quite clearly happening - losing from positions we should not have. I think this does indicate a positive cultural change in the club - a few more attacking and positive shots on goal would have not gone astray. We seemed extremely hesitatant knowing the threat from the counter. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, JMSTEP123 said:

Not wrong. Something as simple as only seeing the outcome cannot allow you to infer how the game yesterday unfolded. 

Lacklustre to say the least in the 2nd half. Having said that, important 3 points if we are to make a stab at the top of the table come end of season. Even the Mooy era would have seen Newcastle score and equalise yesterday. I remember it quite clearly happening - losing from positions we should not have. I think this does indicate a positive cultural change in the club - a few more attacking and positive shots on goal would have not gone astray. We seemed extremely hesitatant knowing the threat from the counter. 

Whilst im not really a fan of Joyce tactically, he comes up short in many areas and there are clearly issues with his man management, i do think he's beginning to turn the cultural issues we've had around.

In his time we have improved our away record enormously, and come from behind a plethora of times, something that you definitely couldnt attribute to us pre his appointment. We have also conceded the fewest goals in the league to this point in the season.

At this point in time i tend to think he's not the man we need going forward into next season, but perhaps we needed that iron fist to reset us in the longer term ie taking a step back to take two forward.

 

The most crazy thing we have at the minute is we are 6 points off top, and 3 off 2nd and 3rd despite what we all perceive as one of the worst periods in our history, with very clear scope to add a few attackers in the next month. Given games against Bris, CCM and WSW in the next 4, plus Perth at home, we could genuinely be in the race come Feb with some serious reinforcements.
Likewise, we've been burnt in these scenarios in the past to no need to be too optimistic either, but there's def a conceivable way out of the mire.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

54 minutes ago, bt50 said:

Whilst im not really a fan of Joyce tactically, he comes up short in many areas and there are clearly issues with his man management, i do think he's beginning to turn the cultural issues we've had around.

In his time we have improved our away record enormously, and come from behind a plethora of times, something that you definitely couldnt attribute to us pre his appointment. We have also conceded the fewest goals in the league to this point in the season.

At this point in time i tend to think he's not the man we need going forward into next season, but perhaps we needed that iron fist to reset us in the longer term ie taking a step back to take two forward.

 

The most crazy thing we have at the minute is we are 6 points off top, and 3 off 2nd and 3rd despite what we all perceive as one of the worst periods in our history, with very clear scope to add a few attackers in the next month. Given games against Bris, CCM and WSW in the next 4, plus Perth at home, we could genuinely be in the race come Feb with some serious reinforcements.
Likewise, we've been burnt in these scenarios in the past to no need to be too optimistic either, but there's def a conceivable way out of the mire.

Why so positive? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, haz said:

Why so positive? 

Cos im not a negative cunt like the rest of you :tooth:

No pretty much just putting some facts out there for context. Im far from bullish about us and our chances, but there's definitely a case for the brightside going into the transfer window.

Likewise, whilst I've clearly stated im not really a fan of reappointing Joyce going forward, you also need to give the devil his due. It hasnt been ALL bad.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, bt50 said:

Cos im not a negative cunt like the rest of you :tooth:

No pretty much just putting some facts out there for context. Im far from bullish about us and our chances, but there's definitely a case for the brightside going into the transfer window.

Likewise, whilst I've clearly stated im not really a fan of reappointing Joyce going forward, you also need to give the devil his due. It hasnt been ALL bad.

Come to the dark side my child

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, bt50 said:

Whilst im not really a fan of Joyce tactically, he comes up short in many areas and there are clearly issues with his man management, i do think he's beginning to turn the cultural issues we've had around.

In his time we have improved our away record enormously, and come from behind a plethora of times, something that you definitely couldnt attribute to us pre his appointment. We have also conceded the fewest goals in the league to this point in the season.

At this point in time i tend to think he's not the man we need going forward into next season, but perhaps we needed that iron fist to reset us in the longer term ie taking a step back to take two forward.

 

The most crazy thing we have at the minute is we are 6 points off top, and 3 off 2nd and 3rd despite what we all perceive as one of the worst periods in our history, with very clear scope to add a few attackers in the next month. Given games against Bris, CCM and WSW in the next 4, plus Perth at home, we could genuinely be in the race come Feb with some serious reinforcements.
Likewise, we've been burnt in these scenarios in the past to no need to be too optimistic either, but there's def a conceivable way out of the mire.

Exactly. 

Probably just a ripple effect though..........

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 5 months later...

image.thumb.png.641340a17e854fff260bef6a9d3bb3f9.png

 

Was bored (and have found a good, granular, reliable data source). I'd had a fairly good discussion about the quality of goals that Melbourne Victory scored with a friend recently about the amount of "good" goals they scored (and with the vague rumours of Toivonen coming to us I thought I'd look a little into the goals he scored this year) - whats phenomenal is the expected goals vs actual goals for Toivonen and Barbarouses this year as they both exceeded their expected goals by a huge amount. While Williams, Krishna and DeLaet also just exceeded their expected totals by a fair margin.

 

image.thumb.png.8e5aa8ab893f2bbea698100f2fdbdc45.png

If you normalise to median minutes played for these players minutes played you can see that a full year of MacLaren would have likely yielded a fairly decent (if unspectacular year), hopefully we can have a gaffer next year that will get a bit more out of him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Tommykins said:

image.thumb.png.641340a17e854fff260bef6a9d3bb3f9.png

 

Was bored (and have found a good, granular, reliable data source). I'd had a fairly good discussion about the quality of goals that Melbourne Victory scored with a friend recently about the amount of "good" goals they scored (and with the vague rumours of Toivonen coming to us I thought I'd look a little into the goals he scored this year) - whats phenomenal is the expected goals vs actual goals for Toivonen and Barbarouses this year as they both exceeded their expected goals by a huge amount. While Williams, Krishna and DeLaet also just exceeded their expected totals by a fair margin.

 

image.thumb.png.8e5aa8ab893f2bbea698100f2fdbdc45.png

If you normalise to median minutes played for these players minutes played you can see that a full year of MacLaren would have likely yielded a fairly decent (if unspectacular year), hopefully we can have a gaffer next year that will get a bit more out of him.

What is the expected goals parameter based on?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Tommykins said:

image.thumb.png.641340a17e854fff260bef6a9d3bb3f9.png

 

Was bored (and have found a good, granular, reliable data source). I'd had a fairly good discussion about the quality of goals that Melbourne Victory scored with a friend recently about the amount of "good" goals they scored (and with the vague rumours of Toivonen coming to us I thought I'd look a little into the goals he scored this year) - whats phenomenal is the expected goals vs actual goals for Toivonen and Barbarouses this year as they both exceeded their expected goals by a huge amount. While Williams, Krishna and DeLaet also just exceeded their expected totals by a fair margin.

 

image.thumb.png.8e5aa8ab893f2bbea698100f2fdbdc45.png

If you normalise to median minutes played for these players minutes played you can see that a full year of MacLaren would have likely yielded a fairly decent (if unspectacular year), hopefully we can have a gaffer next year that will get a bit more out of him.

image01-3.jpg.5ff2e8a7b066a0781d8db56f50369378.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...