belaguttman Posted November 17, 2014 Report Share Posted November 17, 2014 I wonder if a fan $ collection falls outside the salary cap? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
japiedog Posted November 18, 2014 Report Share Posted November 18, 2014 no it is official, ( well i heard a rumour) we can't fit another player, be it Visa or local , under the Salary cap hence no Eastern European LB Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Melburnian Posted November 18, 2014 Report Share Posted November 18, 2014 no it is official, ( well i heard a rumour) we can't fit another player, be it Visa or local , under the Salary cap hence no Eastern European LB What a farce. Not close to best squad in the league and playing short cause of salary cap tightness. JD. Where the fuck is this dude and what the fuck is he doing? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jestr Posted November 18, 2014 Report Share Posted November 18, 2014 JVS is keen to retain Miller anyway, so we back to square 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mattyh001 Posted November 18, 2014 Report Share Posted November 18, 2014 rather surprised to hear the club is out of cap space. discounting Miller out of the squad for replacement purposes, Marino and Melling for youth contracts and we only have 21. surely the likes of Germano, Hoffman, Chapman, Velaphi and Brown, can't be on that much. Archibald, Mauk, Garruccio, Retre (last two might even be considered youth players contract wise) are all younger players so wouldn't be commanding heaps. overall they each might not be so cheap as the minimum wage, but surely wouldnt be that much across at least 9 players. fair screw up otherwise though if true Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NewConvert Posted November 18, 2014 Report Share Posted November 18, 2014 If true it reminds me that when Alistair Clarkson took over the second last placed Hawks, they had the highest salary bill in the league. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jovan Posted November 18, 2014 Report Share Posted November 18, 2014 On the flipside Duff Mooy and Paartalu must be on decent coin to offset the lower paid squad fillers. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
perthheart Posted November 18, 2014 Report Share Posted November 18, 2014 I'd say they've over done it on a Duff, Mooy and Paartalu left us short for this season. However, next year when we clear the majority of the dead wood should allow us to bring in a few more quality players to fill in the obvious gaps in the squad. Everything about this season seems to be pointing towards us building for next season not this year. Will need a quality player to replace Duff, gk and an entire new back line. Will be the difference in us moving forward. If we start something like this next year with the right signings made we will be able to compete for trophies. New GK Hoffman Patty K new cb new lb Paartalu Mooy Koren Mate Kennedy. New LW Subs Redmayne Melling Williams Garruccio Chapman Provided those three outfield positions that need filling are quality internationals I think we will have a genuine shot at the title. Most of the new signings have looked good. It's the old brigade letting us down. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
belaguttman Posted November 18, 2014 Report Share Posted November 18, 2014 rather surprised to hear the club is out of cap space. discounting Miller out of the squad for replacement purposes, Marino and Melling for youth contracts and we only have 21. surely the likes of Germano, Hoffman, Chapman, Velaphi and Brown, can't be on that much. Archibald, Mauk, Garruccio, Retre (last two might even be considered youth players contract wise) are all younger players so wouldn't be commanding heaps. overall they each might not be so cheap as the minimum wage, but surely wouldnt be that much across at least 9 players. fair screw up otherwise though if true I want to do something unusual here and defend the team recruitment strategy in this instance. Last season we had a list that was way below what was required to produce a balanced capable first XI, and had poor depth and so no competition for spaces. Bad performances resulted in repeated selection. IMHO virtually 75% of the list needed to be cleared out. In a salary capped league that can only be done in 1 season if were were replacing like for like quality wise or at best with an incremental improvement in ability. The 2 options are to do this and replace the list often, improving incrementally each year or to buy half a quality list up to the value of the cap in the first season and them replace the rest in the second season (by front loading the payments into season 1 of a contract). I think that the second course will produce better results in a shorter time period and I think that this is the way that we have gone. I'd expect this season to be a transitional year, next season we would have high expectations. There are risks of each option of course, replace the whole list and you are virtually starting again with no guarantee of success, replace the list slower and you risk infecting the new players with aspirational mediocrity. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
melbournelad55 Posted November 18, 2014 Report Share Posted November 18, 2014 miller > murdocca, although i do understand the visa issue Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
drewmelbcity Posted November 18, 2014 Report Share Posted November 18, 2014 miller > murdocca, although i do understand the visa issue Ticker/ bluey > murdocca Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Torn Asunder Posted November 18, 2014 Report Share Posted November 18, 2014 I think that the loan rule changing may have screwed up our cap ... Also who knows what we paid for Villa 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moraiwe Posted November 18, 2014 Report Share Posted November 18, 2014 Whatever it was, it was too much. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Murfy1 Posted November 19, 2014 Report Share Posted November 19, 2014 Liam Miller to stay at Melbourne City until New Year as injury replacement for Jonatan Germano Matt Windley November 19, 2014 MELBOURNE City will keep midfielder Liam Miller until the end of next month. Miller was signed last week on a short-term national team replacement player deal and was one of City’s best in the 2-2 draw with Central Coast Mariners last weekend. But the Herald Sun can reveal the Irishman has now been signed as an injury replacement for Jonatan Germano, who faces more time on the sidelines with ongoing soft tissue complaints. Miller parted company with Brisbane Roar by mutual consent last month. The one-time Manchester United player returned to Brisbane to see his family on Tuesday, but was back training with teammates at La Trobe University on Wednesday morning. He will likely start Saturday night’s game against Sydney FC in midfield alongside Aaron Mooy, who was a late substitute in the Socceroos 2-1 loss to Japan on Tuesday night. http://www.adelaidenow.com.au/sport/football/liam-miller-to-stay-at-melbourne-city-until-new-year-as-injury-replacement-for-jonatan-germano/story-fnk6pqha-1227128880475?nk=a0180c6a9f43e38604e1330e72785733 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Torn Asunder Posted November 19, 2014 Report Share Posted November 19, 2014 (edited) Not a surprise. Better than just having an injured player sitting there doing nothing. Thought he was good value last week ... Should push Mass down the list. Still expect Melling to get game time Edited November 19, 2014 by Torn Asunder 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NewConvert Posted November 19, 2014 Report Share Posted November 19, 2014 Damn. Wanted Davidson as an injury replacement. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NewConvert Posted November 19, 2014 Report Share Posted November 19, 2014 I can also presume from this signing that the club does not believe that it has a defensive problem nor a LB problem. Furthermore, it has enough depth to cover the loss, due to injury or suspension, of any of the starting defensive players. Finally, that all problems stem from the middle of the park and if we get enough players there the team can control and win games. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
n i k o Posted November 19, 2014 Report Share Posted November 19, 2014 I'm hoping this isn't the case, because our whole backline needs to be changed Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jw1739 Posted November 19, 2014 Report Share Posted November 19, 2014 I can also presume from this signing that the club does not believe that it has a defensive problem nor a LB problem. Furthermore, it has enough depth to cover the loss, due to injury or suspension, of any of the starting defensive players. Finally, that all problems stem from the middle of the park and if we get enough players there the team can control and win games. Not necessarily so. Injury-replacements are outside the salary cap. What we appear to have done is stuff up our management of the cap itself, and that is what is preventing us signing the extra players we need at the back. Quite what JD and JvS though they were doing is beyond many of us, but nevertheless they still seem to have their loyal supporters out there... I would have thought that the door is still not quite shut on a defensive reinforcement, with Connor Chapman still out with glandular fever...I can't see why we cannot get an injury replacement to cover his absence as well. Or is long-term sickness such as glandular fever not considered an "injury"? I also think that if JvS would get off his "high-press" high horse for half a season we could do better at the back. Bring in Archibald as a CB and move Wielaert to LB would be OK as long as Wielaert sat a bit deeper. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
markn Posted November 19, 2014 Report Share Posted November 19, 2014 Bring in Archibald as a CB and move Wielaert to LB would be OK as long as Wielaert sat a bit deeper. i agree with Archibald. This kid may be lost to another club if we dont play him. I personally believe Archibald will be a star defender. He has height and grunt. And you got to love anybody with enough guts to kiss Villa after he scores. I just dont know if Wielaert is capable of playing LB. He must be the slowest player in the a-league. Wielaer appears to be a recruitment mistake from Aloisi and JD. But back on topic - I am happy with Miller if he provides cover for an injured player. I just don't know why we persist using a visa spot on Germano. Just cut him. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Embee Posted November 19, 2014 Report Share Posted November 19, 2014 Bring in Archibald as a CB and move Wielaert to LB would be OK as long as Wielaert sat a bit deeper. i agree with Archibald. This kid may be lost to another club if we dont play him. I personally believe Archibald will be a star defender. He has height and grunt. And you got to love anybody with enough guts to kiss Villa after he scores. I just dont know if Wielaert is capable of playing LB. He must be the slowest player in the a-league. Wielaer appears to be a recruitment mistake from Aloisi and JD. But back on topic - I am happy with Miller if he provides cover for an injured player. I just don't know why we persist using a visa spot on Germano. Just cut him. If you cut him his wages will count towards the cap anyway, leaving you a player short and no better off financially. He's of more use playing one game every three months than never playing at all and still being counted towards the cap. 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tesla Posted November 20, 2014 Report Share Posted November 20, 2014 Bring in Archibald as a CB and move Wielaert to LB would be OK as long as Wielaert sat a bit deeper. i agree with Archibald. This kid may be lost to another club if we dont play him. I personally believe Archibald will be a star defender. He has height and grunt. And you got to love anybody with enough guts to kiss Villa after he scores. I just dont know if Wielaert is capable of playing LB. He must be the slowest player in the a-league. Wielaer appears to be a recruitment mistake from Aloisi and JD. But back on topic - I am happy with Miller if he provides cover for an injured player. I just don't know why we persist using a visa spot on Germano. Just cut him. If you cut him his wages will count towards the cap anyway, leaving you a player short and no better off financially. He's of more use playing one game every three months than never playing at all and still being counted towards the cap.Surely this guy has gotten his PR by now and is already in line at Centerlink for some middle class welfare? May be worth keeping if he isn't a visa player (still probably not if he is always injured). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Melburnian Posted November 20, 2014 Report Share Posted November 20, 2014 Germano can't be retained. Surely. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Embee Posted November 20, 2014 Report Share Posted November 20, 2014 Bring in Archibald as a CB and move Wielaert to LB would be OK as long as Wielaert sat a bit deeper. i agree with Archibald. This kid may be lost to another club if we dont play him. I personally believe Archibald will be a star defender. He has height and grunt. And you got to love anybody with enough guts to kiss Villa after he scores. I just dont know if Wielaert is capable of playing LB. He must be the slowest player in the a-league. Wielaer appears to be a recruitment mistake from Aloisi and JD. But back on topic - I am happy with Miller if he provides cover for an injured player. I just don't know why we persist using a visa spot on Germano. Just cut him. If you cut him his wages will count towards the cap anyway, leaving you a player short and no better off financially. He's of more use playing one game every three months than never playing at all and still being counted towards the cap. Surely this guy has gotten his PR by now and is already in line at Centerlink for some middle class welfare? May be worth keeping if he isn't a visa player (still probably not if he is always injured). Pretty sure he's elidgable at the end of this season if he isn't already. On ability alone he's definitely worth it if he's classified as an AU player but if he's barely ever playing it's probably still not worth the money and squad spot, unless he takes a ridiculously small contract. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stewmac Posted November 20, 2014 Report Share Posted November 20, 2014 Germano can't be retained. Surely. Pay as you play deal , im sure he wouldnt be injured half as much Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sheepdog Posted November 20, 2014 Report Share Posted November 20, 2014 Germano can't be retained. Surely. Have you forgotten which club it is we all support? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jw1739 Posted November 20, 2014 Report Share Posted November 20, 2014 Germano can't be retained. Surely. Well if he is, we will have the ultimate confirmation that no-one associated with the management of our club is serious about it. I'm sure he's a lovely bloke, and we want to do the best by him. Terminating someone is rarely easy or pleasant. If we care for him that much we'll find a place for him in our organization, perhaps scouting, perhaps admin, perhaps community. But it just doesn't make sense to have him on the playing roster, whatever his nationality qualification. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
loriente Posted November 20, 2014 Report Share Posted November 20, 2014 Germano can't be retained. Surely. Have you forgotten which club it is we all support? I have seen this statement re: Hoffman for the past 5 years. And yet here we are with him for another 2 years. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kingofhearts Posted November 20, 2014 Report Share Posted November 20, 2014 Germanos my hero. He has what, played 3 games in 2 years? if that doesn't encapsulate the Aussie work spirit, I don't know what does 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Murfy1 Posted November 20, 2014 Report Share Posted November 20, 2014 (edited) I can also presume from this signing that the club does not believe that it has a defensive problem nor a LB problem. Furthermore, it has enough depth to cover the loss, due to injury or suspension, of any of the starting defensive players. Finally, that all problems stem from the middle of the park and if we get enough players there the team can control and win games. Not necessarily so. Injury-replacements are outside the salary cap. It is my understanding that whilst injury-replacement players are outside the cap, they must effectively be 'like for like'. Meaning that a club can't bring in an extra Visa player if an Australian player is injured. Also, wages must be comparable (if not the same), meaning that an international marquee couldn't come in as an injury replacement player for Germano. Germano's wages are not likely to be high, given that he was on minimum wages in his previous contract. So Liam Miller is probably on low wages as the injury replacement player signed through till the end of December. On not signing a LB, I would say it is very presumptuous to assume that the club doesn't think it has a LB problem (if only because Ramsay was dropped after 3 games, and 2 players, Germano and Garuccio, were then played at LB). Also it is being presumptuous to believe that the club thinks everything is rosy with the defence. Moreover, as the club said when Koren was injured, the problem with bringing in an injury replacement from overseas for 5 weeks is they'll need a few weeks to adjust and settle in the A-League, meaning by the time they come good they only put in 2 or so good performances (and then there's the question of what sort of players are free agents in the middle of the season, and are pre-pared to travel to Australia to play for low wages for only 5 or so weeks). The club said Miller was an 'opportunistic' signing. We signed a handy midfielder like him, who's proven in the A-League, because he suddenly became available, was fit and our team was missing 5 midfielders. If a handy LB was made available, and had a situation comparable to Miller, I reckon the club would have brought him in. But there are no decent A-League proven LBs available right now. So given the above, the signing of Miller makes a lot of sense. He's a very tidy ball playing midfielder, who can make the team competitive for places again (and probably push Retre and Murdocca out of the team), and I'm tipping a midfield of him, Mooy and Paartalu to impress. Edited November 20, 2014 by Murfy1 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jake Posted November 20, 2014 Report Share Posted November 20, 2014 (edited) I can also presume from this signing that the club does not believe that it has a defensive problem nor a LB problem. Furthermore, it has enough depth to cover the loss, due to injury or suspension, of any of the starting defensive players. Finally, that all problems stem from the middle of the park and if we get enough players there the team can control and win games.Not necessarily so. Injury-replacements are outside the salary cap. What we appear to have done is stuff up our management of the cap itself, and that is what is preventing us signing the extra players we need at the back. Quite what JD and JvS though they were doing is beyond many of us, but nevertheless they still seem to have their loyal supporters out there... I would have thought that the door is still not quite shut on a defensive reinforcement, with Connor Chapman still out with glandular fever...I can't see why we cannot get an injury replacement to cover his absence as well. Or is long-term sickness such as glandular fever not considered an "injury"? I also think that if JvS would get off his "high-press" high horse for half a season we could do better at the back. Bring in Archibald as a CB and move Wielaert to LB would be OK as long as Wielaert sat a bit deeper. Hasn't this cap issue just been caused by paartalu coming available all of a sudden, late in our list development, and the club using basically everything they had left because they knew how important it was to bring in a quality defensive midfielder? Such players don't come available too often so I understand why they took that step. It has caused issues but it also helps us build for the long term with his 4 year contract. Edited November 20, 2014 by Jake 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NewConvert Posted November 20, 2014 Report Share Posted November 20, 2014 I can also presume from this signing that the club does not believe that it has a defensive problem nor a LB problem. Furthermore, it has enough depth to cover the loss, due to injury or suspension, of any of the starting defensive players. Finally, that all problems stem from the middle of the park and if we get enough players there the team can control and win games. Not necessarily so. Injury-replacements are outside the salary cap. It is my understanding that whilst injury-replacement players are outside the cap, they must effectively be 'like for like'. Meaning that a club can't bring in an extra Visa player if an Australian player is injured. Also, wages must be comparable (if not the same), meaning that an international marquee couldn't come in as an injury replacement player for Germano. Germano's wages are not likely to be high, given that he was on minimum wages in his previous contract. So Liam Miller is probably on low wages as the injury replacement player signed through till the end of December. On not signing a LB, I would say it is very presumptuous to assume that the club doesn't think it has a LB problem (if only because Ramsay was dropped after 3 games, and 2 players, Germano and Garuccio, were then played at LB). Also it is being presumptuous to believe that the club thinks everything is rosy with the defence. Moreover, as the club said when Koren was injured, the problem with bringing in an injury replacement from overseas for 5 weeks is they'll need a few weeks to adjust and settle in the A-League, meaning by the time they come good they only put in 2 or so good performances (and then there's the question of what sort of players are free agents in the middle of the season, and are pre-pared to travel to Australia to play for low wages for only 5 or so weeks). The club said Miller was an 'opportunistic' signing. We signed a handy midfielder like him, who's proven in the A-League, because he suddenly became available, was fit and our team was missing 5 midfielders. If a handy LB was made available, and had a situation comparable to Miller, I reckon the club would have brought him in. But there are no decent A-League proven LBs available right now. So given the above, the signing of Miller makes a lot of sense. He's a very tidy ball playing midfielder, who can make the team competitive for places again (and probably push Retre and Murdocca out of the team), and I'm tipping a midfield of him, Mooy and Paartalu to impress. My original post stemmed from an article in The Age that claimed that Jason Davidson wanted a loan deal so that he could get first team game time and be selectable for the Asian Cup. So here we have an Australian national who is a LB wanting a loan. Interestingly Germano is listed as mid-fielder yet is expected to play defense. Another interesting observation is that the club has only listed four defenders: Kirsnorbo, Wieleart, Hofman and Chapman (so much for depth in defense). So the issue of like for like could be a real stumbling block as well as sorting out the salary. As far as the length of a loan deal it could just as easily be for the remainder of the season, the salary issue could also be sorted out. BTW I did start my post with the word presume. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bt50 Posted November 20, 2014 Report Share Posted November 20, 2014 I can also presume from this signing that the club does not believe that it has a defensive problem nor a LB problem. Furthermore, it has enough depth to cover the loss, due to injury or suspension, of any of the starting defensive players. Finally, that all problems stem from the middle of the park and if we get enough players there the team can control and win games. Not necessarily so. Injury-replacements are outside the salary cap. What we appear to have done is stuff up our management of the cap itself, and that is what is preventing us signing the extra players we need at the back. Quite what JD and JvS though they were doing is beyond many of us, but nevertheless they still seem to have their loyal supporters out there... I would have thought that the door is still not quite shut on a defensive reinforcement, with Connor Chapman still out with glandular fever...I can't see why we cannot get an injury replacement to cover his absence as well. Or is long-term sickness such as glandular fever not considered an "injury"? I also think that if JvS would get off his "high-press" high horse for half a season we could do better at the back. Bring in Archibald as a CB and move Wielaert to LB would be OK as long as Wielaert sat a bit deeper. Hasn't this cap issue just been caused by paartalu coming available all of a sudden, late in our list development, and the club using basically everything they had left because they knew how important it was to bring in a quality defensive midfielder? Such players don't come available too often so I understand why they took that step. It has caused issues but it also helps us build for the long term with his 4 year contract. Correct. And the right call long term too I might add, assuming Paartalu is the player we all think he will be. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NewConvert Posted November 20, 2014 Report Share Posted November 20, 2014 If Paartalau does not become the player we hope that he will be I do hope that the club has an exit clause or performance clause. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Red or Dead Posted November 20, 2014 Report Share Posted November 20, 2014 MELBOURNE CITY SIGNS MILLER UNTIL END OF 2014 Melbourne City confirmed that it has signed Liam Miller as an Injury Replacement Player for the remainder of 2014. Miller, 33, debuted for the club and played 90 minutes in City's 2-2 draw with the Central Coast Mariners on Sunday on a National Team Replacement Player contract. He has now signed on as an Injury Replacement Player for Argentine midfielder Jonatan Germano (hamstring), who has been placed on the long-term injury list. http://theworldgame.sbs.com.au/article/2014/11/21/melbourne-city-signs-miller-until-end-2014 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
drewmelbcity Posted November 20, 2014 Report Share Posted November 20, 2014 MELBOURNE CITY SIGNS MILLER UNTIL END OF 2014 Melbourne City confirmed that it has signed Liam Miller as an Injury Replacement Player for the remainder of 2014. Miller, 33, debuted for the club and played 90 minutes in City's 2-2 draw with the Central Coast Mariners on Sunday on a National Team Replacement Player contract. He has now signed on as an Injury Replacement Player for Argentine midfielder Jonatan Germano (hamstring), who has been placed on the long-term injury list. http://theworldgame.sbs.com.au/article/2014/11/21/melbourne-city-signs-miller-until-end-2014 Paartalu-Miller-Mooy Duff-Williams-Duganzic Everything sounds sweeter on paper. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stewmac Posted November 21, 2014 Report Share Posted November 21, 2014 MELBOURNE CITY SIGNS MILLER UNTIL END OF 2014 Melbourne City confirmed that it has signed Liam Miller as an Injury Replacement Player for the remainder of 2014. Miller, 33, debuted for the club and played 90 minutes in City's 2-2 draw with the Central Coast Mariners on Sunday on a National Team Replacement Player contract. He has now signed on as an Injury Replacement Player for Argentine midfielder Jonatan Germano (hamstring), who has been placed on the long-term injury list. http://theworldgame.sbs.com.au/article/2014/11/21/melbourne-city-signs-miller-until-end-2014 Paartalu-Miller-Mooy Duff-Williams-Duganzic Everything sounds sweeter on paper. shame we play on grass then Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AaronAV11 Posted November 21, 2014 Report Share Posted November 21, 2014 The amount of centre mids we have is a joke. Paartalu, mooy, koren, murdocca, germano, melling, retre, mauk, Kalmar, miller and brown. Meanwhile we 0 natural left backs and 0 natural right backs. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
drewmelbcity Posted November 21, 2014 Report Share Posted November 21, 2014 MELBOURNE CITY SIGNS MILLER UNTIL END OF 2014Melbourne City confirmed that it has signed Liam Miller as an Injury Replacement Player for the remainder of 2014.Miller, 33, debuted for the club and played 90 minutes in City's 2-2 draw with the Central Coast Mariners on Sunday on a National Team Replacement Player contract. He has now signed on as an Injury Replacement Player for Argentine midfielder Jonatan Germano (hamstring), who has been placed on the long-term injury list.http://theworldgame.sbs.com.au/article/2014/11/21/melbourne-city-signs-miller-until-end-2014 Paartalu-Miller-Mooy Duff-Williams-Duganzic Everything sounds sweeter on paper. shame we play on grass then I feel at times our players are allergic to grass especially the defensive end Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sheepdog Posted November 21, 2014 Report Share Posted November 21, 2014 MELBOURNE CITY SIGNS MILLER UNTIL END OF 2014Melbourne City confirmed that it has signed Liam Miller as an Injury Replacement Player for the remainder of 2014.Miller, 33, debuted for the club and played 90 minutes in City's 2-2 draw with the Central Coast Mariners on Sunday on a National Team Replacement Player contract. He has now signed on as an Injury Replacement Player for Argentine midfielder Jonatan Germano (hamstring), who has been placed on the long-term injury list.http://theworldgame.sbs.com.au/article/2014/11/21/melbourne-city-signs-miller-until-end-2014 Paartalu-Miller-Mooy Duff-Williams-Duganzic Everything sounds sweeter on paper.shame we play on grass then I feel at times our players are allergic to grass especially the defensive end Can confirm pigs and I are not allergic to grass Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.