Jump to content
Melbourne Football

MHFC vs WSW @ Parramatta Staduim on Sat 7/12/13 @ 5:30pm


cadete
 Share

Recommended Posts

Billy this is the best example possible!

Lampard and Gerrad are great players in passing, shooting ect.

YaYa toure and Pirlo can do the exact same, BUT are naturally creative players! Get my point? For Murdoca to make a creative play he had to try his heart out, for Harry to make a creative play, it's easy because his naturally creative ( you can't coach or grow into it, your born with it)

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not going to enter the argument over an individual player. Because everyone has their opinions. But the essence of "creativity" is newness and value - that is a creative person is one who takes the same inputs as others, sees something in them that others do not, and produces something new and valuable out of them whereas the others do not.

 

A creative person is not necessarily one who works hard and does routine things well; the two are not necessarily mutually exclusive but frequently are.

 

Heart's problems and position on the ladder are not due to the the qualities of the individual players, and especially are not due to the perceived failings of certain players. As has been said many times, the squad looks good on paper. The problem is that the players function poorly as a team. And that is the result of poor management.

 

In fact, the place where we need the creativity most is in management. A creative manager would take this club perhaps not to a Premiership, but certainly to a respectable position on the ladder.

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not going to enter the argument over an individual player. Because everyone has their opinions. But the essence of "creativity" is newness and value - that is a creative person is one who takes the same inputs as others, sees something in them that others do not, and produces something new and valuable out of them whereas the others do not. A creative person is not necessarily one who works hard and does routine things well; the two are not necessarily mutually exclusive but frequently are. Heart's problems and position on the ladder are not due to the the qualities of the individual players, and especially are not due to the perceived failings of certain players. As has been said many times, the squad looks good on paper. The problem is that the players function poorly as a team. And that is the result of poor management. In fact, the place where we need the creativity most is in management. A creative manager would take this club perhaps not to a Premiership, but certainly to a respectable position on the ladder.

That, in the scheme of things, is really the underlying problem.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You need to clearly define what you mean by "creative" to even begin this discussion. 

I thought I did that.

 

'But the essence of "creativity" is newness and value - that is a creative person is one who takes the same inputs as others, sees something in them that others do not, and produces something new and valuable out of them whereas the others do not.'

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

But Murdocca isn't the reason. He was a solid part of a very successful and 'creative' roar team.

 

I've been waiting for that old chestnut to be dropped. Where do I even begin? Roar was a good team with a good set-up. They won back-to-back championships. Before that they weren't as good. Murdocca had played in every season since their inaugural one. In 162 matches, he had 11 assists.

 

Yes, 11 in 162 appearances, majority of which he started. So what? He is a DM, not an AM. Right, but now you know just what kind of midfielder he is. Now, nobody is saying that he cannot pass forward or 'create' a chance. Anyone can. Like someone said above, it is dependent on a number of factors, one of which is the movement of other players. But at Roar, this bloke was surrounded by quality. In the championship seasons, he had Paartalu/McKay. And in front of him? No less than Sergio Van Dijk, Thomas Broich, Mitch Nichols and then Besart Berisha the following year.

 

Saying he was a 'solid part' of Roar is disingenuous. One could be forgiven for drawing the conclusion that he was an integral part. He wasn't. He had the easiest job of simply running and dropping in the hole. I believe he played as a RM for a few matches too.

 

Here at Heart, he has been found out. I knew that he would. When we signed him, I really hoped we were going to sign another midfielder that would actually be the link from defence to offence. Someone who could dictate the tempo and break down defences. We all know the story of what happened to Engelaar...

 

I have no doubt that he would be a solid complimentary player to another midfielder. We all saw it up in Brisbane. But Roar aren't disappointed that he went to Heart, no way in hell. If they are crying about it, I'm sure they are tears of joy. It's a little hard to see what's going on on the top of the ladder from down here. Roar have a ruthless win-at-all-costs mentality. Release a DM in Murdocca, develop Brattan and bring McKay back. Lose Nichols, bring in Liam Miller. There is the ingredient for success.

 

You see, we have two pedestrian midfielders in our partnership. There is no main man. We can blather on about how Murdocca is just unlucky and that it is everyone else's fault. Sorry. I've heard it all before. Replace him or Mig with Gerhardt and play Kalmar/Kewell as the number 10 and Mifsud & Mebrahtu as the two forwards.

 

A creative player CREATES regardless of the movement of other players. Our forwards have enough experience (despite shit tactical advice from the boss) to move into good positions. I see it a fair bit. It is the transition.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Totally agree with everything you said jw. The simple question which was first made was is Mossimo Murdoca a creative player. Forget about positions and anything els, I'm asking as an individual football player. Jw1739 yes or no answer, is he a creative player?

Overall I would have rated Mass as a hard-working player best suited to doing the routine things well, and best able to display those qualities in a team that kept the ball on the deck playing a crisp 10-20m interpassing game. I guess that's a "no." Mass is currently a victim of Aloisi's lack of management ability.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

But Murdocca isn't the reason. He was a solid part of a very successful and 'creative' roar team.

 

I've been waiting for that old chestnut to be dropped. Where do I even begin? Roar was a good team with a good set-up. They won back-to-back championships. Before that they weren't as good. Murdocca had played in every season since their inaugural one. In 162 matches, he had 11 assists.

 

Yes, 11 in 162 appearances, majority of which he started. So what? He is a DM, not an AM. Right, but now you know just what kind of midfielder he is. Now, nobody is saying that he cannot pass forward or 'create' a chance. Anyone can. Like someone said above, it is dependent on a number of factors, one of which is the movement of other players. But at Roar, this bloke was surrounded by quality. In the championship seasons, he had Paartalu/McKay. And in front of him? No less than Sergio Van Dijk, Thomas Broich, Mitch Nichols and then Besart Berisha the following year.

 

Saying he was a 'solid part' of Roar is disingenuous. One could be forgiven for drawing the conclusion that he was an integral part. He wasn't. He had the easiest job of simply running and dropping in the hole. I believe he played as a RM for a few matches too.

 

Here at Heart, he has been found out. I knew that he would. When we signed him, I really hoped we were going to sign another midfielder that would actually be the link from defence to offence. Someone who could dictate the tempo and break down defences. We all know the story of what happened to Engelaar...

 

I have no doubt that he would be a solid complimentary player to another midfielder. We all saw it up in Brisbane. But Roar aren't disappointed that he went to Heart, no way in hell. If they are crying about it, I'm sure they are tears of joy. It's a little hard to see what's going on on the top of the ladder from down here. Roar have a ruthless win-at-all-costs mentality. Release a DM in Murdocca, develop Brattan and bring McKay back. Lose Nichols, bring in Liam Miller. There is the ingredient for success.

 

You see, we have two pedestrian midfielders in our partnership. There is no main man. We can blather on about how Murdocca is just unlucky and that it is everyone else's fault. Sorry. I've heard it all before. Replace him or Mig with Gerhardt and play Kalmar/Kewell as the number 10 and Mifsud & Mebrahtu as the two forwards.

 

A creative player CREATES regardless of the movement of other players. Our forwards have enough experience (despite shit tactical advice from the boss) to move into good positions. I see it a fair bit. It is the transition.

Gerhardt would be a mistake in midfield, plain and simple he's not good enough on the ball

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't know if anyone has read 'The Numbers Game', another soccer metrics book like Soccernomics that extends our thinking about football further than that helpful book. In this book they make a good case that football is a 'weakest link game' rather than a 'strongest link' game. What they show is that team function improves more but improving the weakest player in the team than it does by taking the 'glittering marquee' player approach. Mass is far from our weakest player, we can debate what sort of player he is, but replacing him with a star creative player will give us less value than replacing our weakest link. Any guess where our weakest link is?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't know if anyone has read 'The Numbers Game', another soccer metrics book like Soccernomics that extends our thinking about football further than that helpful book. In this book they make a good case that football is a 'weakest link game' rather than a 'strongest link' game. What they show is that team function improves more but improving the weakest player in the team than it does by taking the 'glittering marquee' player approach. Mass is far from our weakest player, we can debate what sort of player he is, but replacing him with a star creative player will give us less value than replacing our weakest link. Any guess where our weakest link is?

where do you want to start !!!!!!

what's the old saying

a fish rots from its head first ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't know if anyone has read 'The Numbers Game', another soccer metrics book like Soccernomics that extends our thinking about football further than that helpful book. In this book they make a good case that football is a 'weakest link game' rather than a 'strongest link' game. What they show is that team function improves more but improving the weakest player in the team than it does by taking the 'glittering marquee' player approach. Mass is far from our weakest player, we can debate what sort of player he is, but replacing him with a star creative player will give us less value than replacing our weakest link. Any guess where our weakest link is?

It's the two blokes in the Bunnings chairs.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't know if anyone has read 'The Numbers Game', another soccer metrics book like Soccernomics that extends our thinking about football further than that helpful book. In this book they make a good case that football is a 'weakest link game' rather than a 'strongest link' game. What they show is that team function improves more but improving the weakest player in the team than it does by taking the 'glittering marquee' player approach. Mass is far from our weakest player, we can debate what sort of player he is, but replacing him with a star creative player will give us less value than replacing our weakest link. Any guess where our weakest link is?

It's the two blokes in the Bunnings chairs.

Had to lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

I don't know if anyone has read 'The Numbers Game', another soccer metrics book like Soccernomics that extends our thinking about football further than that helpful book. In this book they make a good case that football is a 'weakest link game' rather than a 'strongest link' game. What they show is that team function improves more but improving the weakest player in the team than it does by taking the 'glittering marquee' player approach. Mass is far from our weakest player, we can debate what sort of player he is, but replacing him with a star creative player will give us less value than replacing our weakest link. Any guess where our weakest link is?

It's the two blokes in the Bunnings chairs.

Had to lol

 

Other than them? Its got to be the number 10 Role

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

 

I don't know if anyone has read 'The Numbers Game', another soccer metrics book like Soccernomics that extends our thinking about football further than that helpful book. In this book they make a good case that football is a 'weakest link game' rather than a 'strongest link' game. What they show is that team function improves more but improving the weakest player in the team than it does by taking the 'glittering marquee' player approach. Mass is far from our weakest player, we can debate what sort of player he is, but replacing him with a star creative player will give us less value than replacing our weakest link. Any guess where our weakest link is?

It's the two blokes in the Bunnings chairs.

Had to lol

 

Other than them? Its got to be the number 10 Role

 

Agree, and we are relying on a talented but injury prone 34 year old who is probably going to give us 15 games at the most and don't have a backup for this position. I'd rather release Migliorini and/or Germano and sign a good number 10. This should be the first priority for a new coach.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I keep forgetting that we have Germano. He is the one to play instead of Gerhardt. A good DM with an engine and someone who gets shit done. I'd take Germano over Murdocca every day of the week. I'm expecting a torrent of abuse but Germano was our starting midfielder when we made the finals and is easily a better pick.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Murdocca might not seem as a creative player because our wonderful manager does not know what creativity is!

 

This disgusting (and quite terribly executed) counter attacking game plan Aloisi has us playing doesn't allow for any creativity so when Murdocca gets the ball, there's no one running around, getting into good positions to receive that 'creative' ball from Murdocca (even if he is just a defensive midfielder).

 

Aloisi is the problem. Kick the ball long to our 5"4' striker and hope he can jump higher than Topor-Stanley who's already a foot taller than him. You saw when Harry Kewell came on Murdocca had someone to pass the ball to as opposed to kicking it long to a statue in Golgol!

 

ALOISI = PROBLEM

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Look it's easy to bag him out, because we've never really had him fully fit... The reason I'd go Germano is because his creative ability is much higher than Murdocca. He had 30 goal attempts in less than 16 games in his first season.

Hey guys, i'm getting the vibe this guy doesn't like murdocca, am i the only one?  :rolleyes:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

"You can't even beat us and were SHIT"

Chant of the night and yes made it back to city in one piece. Few hairy moments but all good.

Huge appearance from the travelling supporters well done lads

Certainly was the best of a number Sheepdog haha !!!! Mind u the chant about Wanderers cheering about hitting the post was gold.

Still laughing at the fact even the Wanderers were cheering us on.

 

My kids are still singing both them chants - Quality work ,

We walked back to the station with Redders mum and sister who kept a low profile as well :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...