Jump to content
Melbourne Football

The longest off season in the world?


Peter
 Share

Recommended Posts

With the amount of dribble we have been able to post over the past few months, the question has to be asked, do we have the longest off season in the world?

Ian Crook seems to think so:

http://au.fourfourtwo.com/news/245663,crook-we-need-a-longer-season.aspx

Should we have a longer season even if it means clashing with the AFL/NRL/Super Rugby seasons?

What should the format be?

How would a longer season affect the league?

Over to you.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

this is where we need the FFA cup, i think the FFA cup will slightly solve this problem.

While the a-league is still trying to compete for attendences and ratings we can't afford to compete with AFL/NRL, the season dates and format is fine IMO, however as i mentioned just before FFA Cup during Pre Season will sort of help, more friendlies perhaps, and maybe bring back the pre season cup they used to have?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not sure whether it's the longest in the world, but it would go close. Don't think there's any doubt that the season is too short, especially here in Melbourne where we lose all traction with the media once the season ends.

I'm not sure about Ian Crook's solution however. I would prefer to see the introduction of two additional competitions rather than an extra round for the A-League. I would do away with the so-called 'finals' for various reasons, and replace it with an 'A-League Cup' which would keep all A-League teams involved for longer. Also, as above, introduce an 'FFA Cup.'

By adding two extra competitions of a different format we give clubs two more opportunities to win something each year, and IMO sharing that winning feeling around is a very important part of building the game.

Edited by jw1739
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have to agree. As a Heart fan from outside Australia is just painful waiting for the new season to start so I can watch some games. I think something most be done to keep the season longer.People here are suggesting a cup to introduced and I fully agree with this. If the the cup was to start sometime toward the end of the season and last another month or so after the grand final ends we would have more games to watch. Also a Super Cup ( which would pretty much be the Grand Final winners vs the FFA Cup winners) would also add another interesting game for us to watch and would gain a large attendance I would hope.

Regarding to a Cup being introduced, there are the two structures the cup could have. It could be run either as the normal cups are ran in England or around the world with teams being randomly chosen to play against each other or it could be a Champions league type situation where there would be group stages, and then the top qualify and play quarter finals and semi finals etc.

Edited by Vlad
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Personally.. Im not a big fan of finals.. Yes it makes for excitement like in AFL and NRL.. Which is probably why they are used, to draw supporters. But football is traditionally about who finishes first. If I had it my way, longer season, with an FFA Cup. Would truly give glory to the greater team, as well as more football. Perfect example is the Mariners last season. Clearly the better team, but with a bit of finals luck which they always seem to carry, brisbane came out on top. Not taking anything away from Brisbane, they are a great side. But when it comes down to it, I don't care if it clashes.. I just want to watch more football

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

obviously this will take years with the extra teams, but IMO, I think this would be the ideal format:

- 14 team league; 28 rounds, each team plays each other twice (one home, one away)

- Finals system at the end of the season as we have now, with this new finals format (top 6)

- FFA cup (which will include state league teams and a-league teams entering the competition at a certain round); the final of this to be played a couple of weeks after the season grand final

- 'Super Cup' as someone here suggested. Winner of grand final vs winner of FFA cup (to be played a week or 2 before the start of the next season)

Top 3 teams in the league will be given an automatic ACL spot. Winner of FFA cup to also be given an ACL spot.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

the a-league is getting better every season, and we've seen recently that a-league teams can definitely do well in the ACL. We need to give the a-league as much exposure as we can, which is why i think it's necessary that we get 4 champions league spots allocated to our league. It'll not only help with the development of players, but also with luring foreign players who want to be plaing champions league football.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I do agree that four teams may be pushing the limit considering the fact that the A-League is a lot newer to the football scene compared to some of the other leagues such as the Korean and Japanese. What might work would be if 2 or 3 teams entered the ACL automatically and then another 2 to 3 teams say place 3 and winners of the FFA Cup would then receive a spot in a knockout stage. This would bring in more revenue for both the A-League and the ACL because of more games= more TV rights.

Also I don't think the cup should be called the FFA cup, I am sure that we could come up with a more creative name for the competition.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Agree we need a cup of some sorts ( and a cup not a toilet seat).

Also incorperating the state leauges with the A leauge teams coming in at the later rounds.

ACL = top 2 in leauge and cup winner = total 3 spots.

Maybe even have a relegation with the top state team being promoted ( after a play off )

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 clubs, 33 fixtures + (at least) a 64 team FFA Cup (= 7 matchdays (or 13 with 2 legs, exc. final)).

Finish the season off with the FFA cup final, which will have the same feel as a GF, and FFA will get thier desired sellout.

Offer the '1/2' ACL place the FFA have to the champion, wich makes it a little more to play for then just silverware.

A-League season is home and away only.

I reckon that will make for the perfect football campaign in this country.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

As much as i'd prefer no finals, i don't see it happening in Australian sport, it's part of our tradition where the 2 best teams play off to win the ultimate prize. What makes me sad is the fact that whoever finishes 1st gets a rather pointless "premiers trophy" or what ever, i mean We have Premiers who are the mariners atm, and champions who are the roar, yet noone values the premiers, we either need to make a bigger focus on the premiers and make it mean something or scrap the finals, which as i mentioned before wont happen.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 clubs, 33 fixtures + (at least) a 64 team FFA Cup (= 7 matchdays (or 13 with 2 legs, exc. final)).

Finish the season off with the FFA cup final, which will have the same feel as a GF, and FFA will get thier desired sellout.

Offer the '1/2' ACL place the FFA have to the champion, wich makes it a little more to play for then just silverware.

A-League season is home and away only.

I reckon that will make for the perfect football campaign in this country.

This.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 clubs, 33 fixtures + (at least) a 64 team FFA Cup (= 7 matchdays (or 13 with 2 legs, exc. final)).

Finish the season off with the FFA cup final, which will have the same feel as a GF, and FFA will get thier desired sellout.

Offer the '1/2' ACL place the FFA have to the champion, wich makes it a little more to play for then just silverware.

A-League season is home and away only.

I reckon that will make for the perfect football campaign in this country.

+1

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i still think we need to eventually have a 14-16 teams competition with each team only playing each other twice in the regular home & away season.

If we keep playing every team 3 times in the regular season, AND we incorporate an FFA cup, there's the possibility of teams playing each other 5 times in the space of 7-8 months. IMO this is one of the main reasons the a-league has struggled to hold onto fans and have had people 'drop off' because they find the repetitiveness boring. It would help to make the 'big fixtures' even bigger and more special

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

i still think we need to eventually have a 14-16 teams competition with each team only playing each other twice in the regular home & away season.

If we keep playing every team 3 times in the regular season, AND we incorporate an FFA cup, there's the possibility of teams playing each other 5 times in the space of 7-8 months. IMO this is one of the main reasons the a-league has struggled to hold onto fans and have had people 'drop off' because they find the repetitiveness boring. It would help to make the 'big fixtures' even bigger and more special

I tend to agree but the SPL over the course of history has had the same amount of teams and has had both some very boring periods like the 1990's and also some very interesting periods as well such as the 1980's.

But sometimes I do think to myself: Playing CCM for the third time... :rolleyes:

Edited by cadete
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 clubs, 33 fixtures + (at least) a 64 team FFA Cup (= 7 matchdays (or 13 with 2 legs, exc. final)).

Finish the season off with the FFA cup final, which will have the same feel as a GF, and FFA will get thier desired sellout.

Offer the '1/2' ACL place the FFA have to the champion, wich makes it a little more to play for then just silverware.

A-League season is home and away only.

I reckon that will make for the perfect football campaign in this country.

A-League must have finals. Without the threat of relegation - teams who are not in contention for top spots come the mid point of the season will have nothing to play for.

A sorely missed point for those who argue for its removal.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

A-League must have finals. Without the threat of relegation - teams who are not in contention for top spots come the mid point of the season will have nothing to play for.

A sorely missed point for those who argue for its removal.

There's no argument against finals for football in our country, it's in our culture and what the punters demand!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A-League must have finals. Without the threat of relegation - teams who are not in contention for top spots come the mid point of the season will have nothing to play for.

A sorely missed point for those who argue for its removal.

+1 these types of things keep people interested in the league and their teams

Victory, who average 20,000+ crowds a season, technically weren't out of contention for the finals until their last home game which they had 11,000 people attend. Without finals, they would've been out of contention many many rounds before, and therefore getting crowds much less what they should be getting for a number of fixtures, not only one.

We have to remember that we aren't living in europe where football is the number 1 sport, and our population isn't very big. Therefore we must do everything possible to make the league as exciting and less repetitive to keep people interested and going to the matches.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Feel like we've had this discussion a million times on this forum.

there's the possibility of teams playing each other 5 times in the space of 7-8 months.

With the current format isn't it possible (and quite likely) to play one team 6 times in a season? So 5 times (assuming the fifth is a replay cup tie) is not that much.

FWIW, this is hardly unusual in a top division too. Top teams in Europe could potentially play each other 9 times in a season. It has created more rivalries than anything tbh.

A-League must have finals. Without the threat of relegation - teams who are not in contention for top spots come the mid point of the season will have nothing to play for.

Agree, for it's immediate future.

jw, mentioned the Belgian league above but I think something like the Swiss or Austrian league would be good to look at. Both have ten teams with relegation and a cup.

Definitely can't get rid of finals until we have a successful relegation system and cup imo.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Having no interest in AFL, I am in favour of the model suggested by Ian Crook and more recently those at Perth.

I don't like the finals and would rather see a cup competition instead.

The two home and away fixtures would also allow for more derbys both for us as well as more games that allow for away trips such as Adelaide and Sydney. This should boost average crowds.

Having more games with higher crowds looks better on telly and should lead to more sponsorship $$$$$.

As for the length of the off season, "are we there yet, are we there yet, are we there yet?"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ppl are always happy to suggest New A League Clubs and New Cups Comps feat Non A League teams for more games of football in this country to be played.

However they are far less inclined to then go and watch these proposed New Club's games and those Cup games feat these Non A League teams.

In short these things require money and support: Which is just not there atm.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ppl are always happy to suggest New A League Clubs and New Cups Comps feat Non A League teams for more games of football in this country to be played.

However they are far less inclined to then go and watch these proposed New Club's games and those Cup games feat these Non A League teams.

In short these things require money and support: Which is just not there atm.

Chicken and egg?

NQF were chopped prematurely. Their attendances were not too bad. FFA refused to allow Singapore interests to take over the club, and then paradoxically allowed Brisbane to be taken over by Indonesian interests.

GCU were, I admit, a basket case, but Big Clive was prepared to keep funding them after putting $18m of his personal fortune into the club, and it was a hissy fit by Frank Lowy that saw the end of them.

But for these issues we would presently have 12 clubs...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Take away the finals and watch how quickly the league folds. Australians need it, most were brought up on "finals foody!!".

Season is too short, no doubt about that. Only way to get a longer season is by bringing in more teams. But no where is ready that doesn't already have a team (Canberra?). So it really is all about consolidation and laying foundations for future expansion. Which is what the FFA are doing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

not as bad as last year tbh, season finished later, euro's, olympics + prem starts in 18 days or whatever, mon.

Exactly

Last preseason we were jumping out of skins just to drink endless Mountain Dew at Wendouree West Pizza Hut and watch a bunch of kids in MH Shirts (None of us knew) play sokka against the Ballarat Red Devils in a swamp.

Now that is true Off Season Blues.

Edited by cadete
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...
  • 7 months later...

I thought I would drag this thread back up as with the world cup coming up, I wonder if the lack of matches in the A-League is costing us (and other A-League clubs) quality players concerned they will not get match practice and fitness.

Thoughts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...