-
Posts
2,478 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
15
Posts posted by moops
-
-
We should realy approach Honda and their HART devision, since they are a sister club to Honda there should be no conflict with FFA, what better sponsor for us than HART?
- 1
-
As a striker, there would be (in my opinion) none better than Klose or Ibrahimovich, Drogba and Dukes are up there.
-
I want a Melbourne Heart that only cares about Melbourne Heart.Just because we are allied with another club doesn't mean we are a B team or anything like that.
It has a heap of merit. If you get the agreement right.
How does an afiliation detract from that? Because it adds another Club into the decision making process...
That is why I gave the example of Hannover96, a club I have followed a long time, Manchester U has no say in the club opperations/philosophy, why assume on the premiss of the afl? A competition followed by three states, four if you count Tasmania.
-
A better prospect than meuwiss or whatever his name is (no disrespect ment) could have come in, or a lb loan, cb loan, nothing has an elliment of assuredness, it is all conjecture. But your alusion of no benefit astounds me.
-
At least Williams has a shot at goal, half the season they had the ball outside the box and then just gave it up
I know where you are going, but it has more to do about positioning play Aloisi employed.
-
I want a Melbourne Heart that only cares about Melbourne Heart.Just because we are allied with another club doesn't mean we are a B team or anything like that.
It has a heap of merit. If you get the agreement right.
How does an afiliation detract from that?
-
-
It can be beneficial, it's all in the fine print. Maybe an anual friendly, coaching support/clinics, injury loans whatever, it just needs to be negotiated as is beneficial.
Look at Hannover96 in the Bundesliga, they have a strong affiliation with Manchester U, which allowed them to get Diouf, it is a lot more beneficial to Hannover96 than the other way around.
-
It seems the boss realy likes him which is great.
-
@Bella, I am in no way a phisio but I have been involved in various sports. How about stregnthening specific muscles around the injury as a way of proventing further injury, the body is never the same after an injury.
-
Our system is not shite, our ability to play it consistently has been, and our ability to adapt to problems served up by the opposition has also been shite. Our system relies on speedy ball movement and accurate passing if we are counter-attacking, and movement off the ball and ball speed and retention if we are playing possession. It also relies on team pressing and counter-pressing. When we have done those things moderately well we have looked good and we have almost always won (the second Sydney game is the exception) but usually we just haven't played our system at all or only for brief periods. A poacher is very useful if we are playing possession football and manage to keep the ball in the attacking third rather than our defensive third. What we need is a range of player options so that we are able to field a team that creates problems for our opponent at the time and is able to work around the problems that our opponent sets for us.Seriously the system is shite – Get rid of it as its yielded nothing.
And if we want to keep it then there is no reason why a poacher cannot play in such a system anyway if his good enough,
just look at the “Tap In Specialist” at Brisbane.
If the system is unable to be played by those chosen to execute it, then its a shit system we either need to change the system, change the coach or change the players. We have opted to change the players. Any of those can be successful. Given that our problem was the speed of decision making and poor movement off the ball as well as repeated individual errors, changing the players seems to be a reasonable choice IF it's done properly. What's more important is who we sign to replace those we have released as they are all key position players in our system.
But the problems of positional play, pressing, and decision making should come about with coaching. There is nothing wrong with the formation, more in how it is deployed. In my opinion a 433 needs to be fluid becuase otherwise it's predictable and easy to counter and there are many training excercises developed to speed up decision making.
On another note I just read about Duganzic, enthused about next year, his recovery program consists 'mostly on hopping on a bike and he hopes to start running soon? What kind of program is that? A bit worrying.
- 1
-
Huub Stevens is a free agent.
-
Kontra 11 ' a player will not give their all in training
either if the coach has favorites that play each
week no matter the performance, result or
situation.
Quoted.
I think in this you are correct.
-
I hope there is another fan forum because I am prepared to ask JA, Mr. Munn, Mr. Sidwell the tough questions about club vision and football direction which at the moment is non existent.
At the fan forum post the WSW match, I asked this question. Part of the response is in this thread on page 20.
The other response was that in Munn's eyes, the club vision had not changed between JvS and JA. what a joke
On what premise do you base your hilarity?
Club vision is or can be totaly seperate to club success.
I do though think at times it has been ignored selection wise and with the club missive to play Euro football, have missed a trick this year only having a rigid 433. With JA's background, it's a wonder we never played a 352 with our attacking fullbacks and sometimes a 442 would have been astute. But without a propper youth accadamy, 3 formations would be too much.
There is nothing wrong with the clubs vision (as simplistic as it is), maybe the application at times has been wanting.
-
I don't know?
But Victoria has a very strong footsal competition, I am surprised no one has come from there after seeing Rogic flourish.
-
Stubbins will be a free agent as well.
Either him or Papas would be better than Fox one would think.
-
Last year I was chating to an 'aquantance', his son was 16 playing in the seniors for some country side in bendigo as a treq. Now I do understand familial exageration, but 16 against seniors, 6 goals and assists in 10 games says potential.
I cannot remember the kids name (only he was of spanish extraction) but I would like to see someone like this signed for the youth team, rather than 18-19yr olds who realy at that age should be pushing for spots.
-
Marquees for next season: Bresciano and Raul
This would be awesome.
-
JD is a working cog in a fualty machine.
As far as I know he would put to the coach available and suitable transfer targets, the coach then selects from the list, JD handles the negotiations.
-
I think he will be there next year, with 2 years still on his contract.
Arthur Papas will not be taking up a new contract next year in India and will be available.
-
-
I think walker deserves a bench spot at least.
-
I have followed LUFC for most of my life, becuase that's where my matriachal family comes from. Even now I still follow them and things arn't that rosey.
I have disliked Victory since the VPL, so I could never support them and when Heart came along, I chose them and will support them through thick and thin, one day they will have their glory in the sun and I will enjoy it more becuase of the lows.
-
Good idea, though i have no links to post.
Sponsors
in Melbourne City
Posted
Ok... not sure if the message carries sarcasm or not?