Jump to content
Melbourne Football

Wsw away Sunday 15th kickoff 3pm


MHFC-FAN
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, rass said:

Probably the best I've seen us play without taking all 3 points. 

For a team sitting 3rd or whatever and at home, i thought WSW were pathetic. Guess the result is the only thing that matters in the end but they were totally shithouse, as the stats prove. And contrary to the commentary, their defence was woeful. No structure or skill; just a bunch of big blokes sitting deep and trying to fill up space. Then hopefully get a long ball out and pray Borello outsprints his opponent. If people think Rudan is a good coach, they're clueless.

Any other day and we could have put 6 past them.

WSW set out to not lose at home, and in that respect, they did pretty well. A little more luck though and we could have won 3-1, sometimes that happens. In the old days though, we would have lost that game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My feeling is that wastefulness of scoring chances had been building up under PK's leadership and had become systemic. 30+ shots for one goal is just not good enough. I'm hopeful that Rado can tweak the way we play to address this. IMO we really need someone on the bench like Rafa who could come on when JMac is having an off day, and there wasn't anyone like that on today's bench. Nabbout is notoriously wasteful, and Berenguer just doesn't have the pace.

That said, let's not complain too much. We were away to the third-placed side and playing in less than desirable weather conditions and we've come away with a point. As @belaguttman says, in the old days we would have lost once we went behind.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, jw1739 said:

My feeling is that wastefulness of scoring chances had been building up under PK's leadership and had become systemic. 30+ shots for one goal is just not good enough. I'm hopeful that Rado can tweak the way we play to address this. IMO we really need someone on the bench like Rafa who could come on when JMac is having an off day, and there wasn't anyone like that on today's bench. Nabbout is notoriously wasteful, and Berenguer just doesn't have the pace.

That said, let's not complain too much. We were away to the third-placed side and playing in less than desirable weather conditions and we've come away with a point. As @belaguttman says, in the old days we would have lost once we went behind.

Regarding the "old days", my Melbourne Heart therapist is trying to make peace with the past and move on. Things are different now and I don't need to compare today to an ear that lies in the past. I am trying but this forum is not helping...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, NewConvert said:

Regarding the "old days", my Melbourne Heart therapist is trying to make peace with the past and move on. Things are different now and I don't need to compare today to an ear that lies in the past. I am trying but this forum is not helping...

I have mostly good memories of Melbourne Heart.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

What i think should be highlighted is that the WSW goal was very good. They played it out from the back quickly and incisively. The ball into Najjarine and then the weight of the pass he played was excellent. These are the sort of goals that should be recognised, even when they go against your team, as they demonstrate that the A-league has moments of real quality.

For that reason I don't feel hard done by with the result. I'd much rather yesterday's game than have drawn because of a blunder at the back or a lucky deflection.   

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Given we have Tilio, Nabbout and Leckie, and the latter two have both played up front for the Socceroos, then im more than content with not worrying about an injury replacement.

We also have Rafa in the wings, and tbh i dont know that youre getting anyone remotely useful for the 60 oddk, if that, that Caputo is on.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, bt50 said:

Given we have Tilio, Nabbout and Leckie, and the latter two have both played up front for the Socceroos, then im more than content with not worrying about an injury replacement.

We also have Rafa in the wings, and tbh i dont know that youre getting anyone remotely useful for the 60 oddk, if that, that Caputo is on.

Sulemani isn't so bad when he gets forward either. https://melbournecityfc.com.au/videos/id/scholarship-signing-arion-sulemani-highlights/6308936216112

I'm not even sure that the rules permit injury replacements for Scholarship players?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Tommykins said:

I think in terms of the youth setup there's a chance that Sulemani has supplanted Caputo as the best forward in the youth system.

I'm looking forward to seeing him. I've only seen him for 20 minutes in an NPL game in Ballarat before he went off injured. I think he'd already got one by then.... But I gather he's useful.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, NewConvert said:

I s Rafa a #9? I don't have an issue with playing Nabbout or Leckie as a #9 if there is an injury to JMac but they are not  out and out #9s.

I believe that he is. Has a goal to his credit in his limited minutes so far. IMO a very fluid and mobile player.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In the NPL set up he plays more as an AM with Caputo as the striker. Look at there goals in NPL level, 21 from 26 games for Caputo and  9 from 20 with Rafa. I reckon he plays more like an AM as well, a little bit of incisive passing rather than an out and out shot taker. He really needs to play some games this year, I wonder if it's worthwhile loaning him out to somewhere like we did with Moudi Najjar and can really work out if he has the grade

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, NewConvert said:

I s Rafa a #9? I don't have an issue with playing Nabbout or Leckie as a #9 if there is an injury to JMac but they are not  out and out #9s.

The problem with playing Leckie as a #9 is that we lose his effectiveness as a wide player. The emphasis these days is on players that can play multiple positions: there's a place for that and it's important, but there's also some value in a specialist #9

Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, belaguttman said:

The problem with playing Leckie as a #9 is that we lose his effectiveness as a wide player. The emphasis these days is on players that can play multiple positions: there's a place for that and it's important, but there's also some value in a specialist #9

Sure, but if its just for a game or two then we can make do. If Jmac goes down with something more serious, then we can use the injury replacement rules to bring in a more credentialed striker for a more appropriate amount of money.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

47 minutes ago, bt50 said:

Sure, but if its just for a game or two then we can make do. If Jmac goes down with something more serious, then we can use the injury replacement rules to bring in a more credentialed striker for a more appropriate amount of money.

Leckie, in particular in this league, can play anywhere in the front half. He's probably our best #10 when he moves into that position. Can easily play as a hold up #9 (strong and technical), fast enough as an off the shoulder #9 and can out jump most defenders and is a great header.

Great asset.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, rass said:

Leckie, in particular in this league, can play anywhere in the front half. He's probably our best #10 when he moves into that position. Can easily play as a hold up #9 (strong and technical), fast enough as an off the shoulder #9 and can out jump most defenders and is a great header.

Great asset.

Absolutely, my point, though is that the replacements in his position are less effective, lessening the effectiveness of the team. We should be giving our JMac successor more game time now so that he's ready to step up

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, bt50 said:

Sure, but if its just for a game or two then we can make do. If Jmac goes down with something more serious, then we can use the injury replacement rules to bring in a more credentialed striker for a more appropriate amount of money.

If it's during the game we can make do. If JMac is not available I would rather have Leckie out wide or as a #10. I also noticed that no one else is talking about Nabbout or Tilio as a makeshift #9. Which tells me that no one thinks that is a realistic position for them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...