Mr MO Posted December 26, 2022 Report Share Posted December 26, 2022 (edited) 11 hours ago, jw1739 said: C'mon. Impracticable. Would mean one or more cameras filming every second including pre- and post-match. A VAR for the crowd. And then there would be complaints about privacy. Regrettably flares were thrown from the southern end, and some form of sanction is warranted. I see this as a pre-emptive strike by City to try and get our active support back to what it used to be before others such as APL or the police start banning individuals and shutting down the section for a longer period. By complaining about this two-match ban you're just digging a deeper and deeper hol. City, in particular, wouldn't care if they lost a couple of hundred cheap memberships if they did away with active altogether. You have to know that you are under constant CCTV in these venues. except for the toilet, they have you on camera from the minute you walk up to the stadium until you leave. Look around you or up in the stands, next time you are there. I’m not joking here. They don’t care about any fans, active or no active JW - that’s clear right? The narrative is working, that us the fans are the problem, let’s not forget why we had protest in the first place. I’m just an upset fan, I know in the heat of moment, after the finals move to Sydney announcement. I said that this club wasn’t getting my money anymore. I see nothing from my club to change my mind so far. I’m sure many including the club won’t mind and that’s fine. Edited December 26, 2022 by Mr MO 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.