Jump to content
Melbourne Football

WSW v Melbourne City FC - Wednesday 11th March 2015


n i k o
 Share

Recommended Posts

Can't see Nicky Kalmar mentioned for Wanderers. Is he still there, but just for their ACL campaign?

JW, I've been having a bit of trouble following his contract situation. I believe he is technically only allowed to play in ACL matches, but with Bridge now out he will most likely be activated as an IRP (and so eligible for A-league matches too), which is three weeks after his last IRP deal expired.

However, Graham Arnold said two weeks ago in a press conference before their derby that it was bullshit that Kalmar could replace Santalab as an IRP because Nick is a midfielder, not a forward.

Not sure where the ACL restriction comes into it though. Also not sure what the hell is happening in terms of who he is replacing etc.

Pretty sure Arnie is a BS artist anyway!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Can't see Nicky Kalmar mentioned for Wanderers. Is he still there, but just for their ACL campaign?

 

JW, I've been having a bit of trouble following his contract situation. I believe he is technically only allowed to play in ACL matches, but with Bridge now out he will most likely be activated as an IRP (and so eligible for A-league matches too), which is three weeks after his last IRP deal expired.

 

However, Graham Arnold said two weeks ago in a press conference before their derby that it was bullshit that Kalmar could replace Santalab as an IRP because Nick is a midfielder, not a forward.

 

Not sure where the ACL restriction comes into it though. Also not sure what the hell is happening in terms of who he is replacing etc.

If you can follow who eligible for what comp your doing well

Kalmar, bulut and tanaka seem to chop and change between being available and not depending on which way the wind is blowing

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Can't see Nicky Kalmar mentioned for Wanderers. Is he still there, but just for their ACL campaign?

JW, I've been having a bit of trouble following his contract situation. I believe he is technically only allowed to play in ACL matches, but with Bridge now out he will most likely be activated as an IRP (and so eligible for A-league matches too), which is three weeks after his last IRP deal expired.

However, Graham Arnold said two weeks ago in a press conference before their derby that it was bullshit that Kalmar could replace Santalab as an IRP because Nick is a midfielder, not a forward.

Not sure where the ACL restriction comes into it though. Also not sure what the hell is happening in terms of who he is replacing etc.

If you can follow who eligible for what comp your doing well

Kalmar, bulut and tanaka seem to chop and change between being available and not depending on which way the wind is blowing Very true mate. I've read that he replaced Baccus, Castelen, Santalab and now Bridge on top of being an ACL player. I doubt FFA even know. They're too busy lording over us and Glory ATM.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Season-defining match. It may not determine where we finally finish on the table, but it will demonstrate once and for all whether we have the necessary grit and determination to grind out the result we need. We are a team with finals pretensions playing a team sitting 16 points below us, with one win to its name. A loss will be humiliating.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...