Jump to content
Melbourne Football

Transfer Talk, Rumours and Speculation


jw1739

Recommended Posts

...and that's it.

In the end, we have replaced Redmayne with Sorensen. Should be a huge difference.

This isn't a fair comparison. Sure Redmayne has been replaced by Sorenson but we've also lost a VISA place and some cap space in the process. Worth the upgrade? I don't think so. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This isn't a fair comparison. Sure Redmayne has been replaced by Sorenson but we've also lost a VISA place and some cap space in the process. Worth the upgrade? I don't think so. 

I disagree mate.

We had two keepers last season and we have two keepers this season. It's a direct replacement Redmayne for Sorensen.

I don't understand what you mean by we have lost a VISA place. If he didn't get it, someone else would have. There's 11 players that start a game - not everyone is an outfielder.

BTW, I'm not saying it's the greatest signing ever, but I thin I understand why it was done.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

No professional footballer ever has a guarantee of a starting place in the side, and I'd be very surprised if Tando was that naive. My guess is that his own re-signing was delayed while the Sorensen signing was finalised and possibly even the relationship between the two GKs discussed with him.

By the way, I think those saying that Sorensen had retired are mistaken. He told Stoke that he was leaving when his contract expired, and arranged his ride across the U.S. I recall seeing him asked (on Twitter I think) whether he might return to the Danish League, and his reply was along the lines that "anything is possible."

Koren appears to be...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I disagree mate.

We had two keepers last season and we have two keepers this season. It's a direct replacement Redmayne for Sorensen.

I don't understand what you mean by we have lost a VISA place. If he didn't get it, someone else would have. There's 11 players that start a game - not everyone is an outfielder.

BTW, I'm not saying it's the greatest signing ever, but I thin I understand why it was done.

Not exactly. If Sorenson ends up second keeper then he will never play a game unless Velaphi gets injured or gets red carded. At least with an outfield player they can come on off the bench and still be utilised. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This isn't a fair comparison. Sure Redmayne has been replaced by Sorenson but we've also lost a VISA place and some cap space in the process. Worth the upgrade? I don't think so. 

Only if there was a genuine better visa option that we passed up for Sorensen, and also only if there were another decent Australian keeper that we could have signed as a number 1 or 2 keeper under the cap. As we didn't do this my assumption is that this was the best of the available options. we'll see though. I've got more concerns about the suitability of Aaron Hughes than I do about Sorensen

  • Like 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Yeah, but. He's been training at a premier league Club all that time. And he's had a bit of a cycle so he will clearly be fit. He's only got to jump around a bit,  tell the defence what to do, and catch a ball.  This is going to be good. 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sorensen will be better than Tando & Redders combined. 

Seriously. How bad was Redmayne last season? Anyone is an improvement on him.

Tando did well when he came in however a significant improvement in goals conceded was required including goalkeeper & defenders. We have done well in strengthening at the back.

Good luck Thomas.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Love how everyone on the forum just writes everyone off before they have even played one game for us.

Every non-marquee visa player will have a question mark, or a flaw, whether it's age, durability, lack of experience, whatever. Otherwise they wouldn't be playing in the bloody A-League. I wonder how long it will take for people to get this through their heads.

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Everyone keeps mentioning how important a goalkeeper is in relation to the Sorenson signing.

It really is the least important player in the starting 11.

The fact that goalkeepers have the lowest transfer fees on average is proof of this.

Overall I'm happy to see how the signing goes, but can't help think the visa spot could have gone to better use.

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Everyone keeps mentioning how important a goalkeeper is in relation to the Sorenson signing.

It really is the least important player in the starting 11.

The fact that goalkeepers have the lowest transfer fees on average is proof of this.

Overall I'm happy to see how the signing goes, but can't help think the visa spot could have gone to better use.

I'll say it again and again, Victory won the championship with Coe and then the premiership with Thomas. 

Couldn't agree more tbh

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'll say it again and again, Victory won the championship with Coe and then the premiership with Thomas. 

Couldn't agree more tbh

Yeah people like to point out that top teams have good keepers, but top teams usually have good keepers in every position. When they do have a weak position it's because it's hard to sign someone for that position, eg it costs too much (for an attacker) or there is a lack of quality (this applies for fullbacks if you ask me). Goalkeepers are pretty easy signings to make usually. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Now I'm not the biggest fan of CFG, but since they've taken over we have signed these former EPL players:

Duff
Koren
Hughes
Sorenson (looks likely)

When we were Heart, which player have we signed that's come directly from one of the top 4 leagues?

Grella who had played 2 games with Blackburn and a whole 22mins with us? Anyone else?

Garcia.

edit: well actually no. Hull had been relegated a couple of years earlier, so whilst he played EPL for Hull and came from Hull, he didn't come direct from the EPL.

Edited by Shahanga
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Everyone keeps mentioning how important a goalkeeper is in relation to the Sorenson signing.

It really is the least important player in the starting 11.

The fact that goalkeepers have the lowest transfer fees on average is proof of this.

Overall I'm happy to see how the signing goes, but can't help think the visa spot could have gone to better use.

Irrespective of whether you are correct in saying that the GK least important player in the team, it doesn't mean that you shouldn't sign the best one you can find.

The only valid argument that you and others have on Sorensen is that "...the visa spot could have gone to better use." But none of those saying this have suggested an alternative player who could be (or could have been) signed under the cap.

That said, I would support anyone who, even without giving names, thinks we should have gone for another competent central striker to boost the squad. I have little confidence in Marino, Dekker, Williams or Brown filling that role. We might yet make that signing of course, with Mooy's salary now outside the cap, but as I feel every season, we seem to leave our signings too late. 

On "...wasting a visa spot" IMO Hughes is dangerously close to falling into that category as well, but he's not getting the same attention from the Forum as Sorenson is.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Irrespective of whether you are correct in saying that the GK least important player in the team, it doesn't mean that you shouldn't sign the best one you can find.

The only valid argument that you and others have on Sorensen is that "...the visa spot could have gone to better use." But none of those saying this have suggested an alternative player who could be (or could have been) signed under the cap.

That said, I would support anyone who, even without giving names, thinks we should have gone for another competent central striker to boost the squad. I have little confidence in Marino, Dekker, Williams or Brown filling that role. We might yet make that signing of course, with Mooy's salary now outside the cap, but as I feel every season, we seem to leave our signings too late. 

On "...wasting a visa spot" IMO Hughes is dangerously close to falling into that category as well, but he's not getting the same attention from the Forum as Sorenson is.

Ive already made mention to the Hughes signing. What we needed to do was sign a visa centre back that is in his late 20s that is of better quality than any domestic players. We are going into the season with two ageing and slowing, centre backs trying to play a high pressing game? It's mind boggling. 

We should have kept Tando in goals and made our final signing, as you said jw, on another forward that is also able to play on the right wing. Signing Sorenson leaves us thin up front and signing Hughes leaves us slow at the back. 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Irrespective of whether you are correct in saying that the GK least important player in the team, it doesn't mean that you shouldn't sign the best one you can find.

The only valid argument that you and others have on Sorensen is that "...the visa spot could have gone to better use." But none of those saying this have suggested an alternative player who could be (or could have been) signed under the cap.

That said, I would support anyone who, even without giving names, thinks we should have gone for another competent central striker to boost the squad. I have little confidence in Marino, Dekker, Williams or Brown filling that role. We might yet make that signing of course, with Mooy's salary now outside the cap, but as I feel every season, we seem to leave our signings too late. 

On "...wasting a visa spot" IMO Hughes is dangerously close to falling into that category as well, but he's not getting the same attention from the Forum as Sorenson is.

It's not our job to name players, isn't that what the club has a network of 35892635789234234 scouts for?

It's not like we are Man City where there is only a limited number of players in the world that could improve the first 11 (and even then, this limited number I mention is actually quite large).

But for us there are probably 1,000 players out there who would be available under the cap and could improve our first 11.

Anyway, I'll have faith that those responsible for the signing know what they're doing and there is a reason they preferred to use the visa spot on a goalkeeper rather than another position.  But if it's half way through the season and we're clearly lacking a player in another position and there are no Australian players around to fill it, I'll be pretty annoyed TBH.

 

Sorenson will earn us points, he'll turn losses into draws and draws into wins.

The standard line for when a team signs a new keeper. Doubt it actually works out like that in reality.

Honestly if the opposition is getting that many shots on target that the keeper is making a huge difference then there is a problem else where, which if fixed would be more influential than the goalkeeper is.

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sorenson will earn us points, he'll turn losses into draws and draws into wins.

I'm a defender so it's nice to see that we're aiming to be that team that is really tough to score against.

As we saw from the Tards last season, if you have the firepower up front and score more goals than you concede you will win a LOT more games! "Derrrr" you say, but it seems JvS hasn't figured that out yet.

We might be hard to score against, but if we have another season where our strikers don't put away the goals they should be putting away, we'll be finishing with more losses than wins...again!

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Balance is important in a successful team. Whilst teams will generally play an attacking or a defensive style, attacking teams always come up against a team that can defend better and limit their scoring opportunities. over the course of a season an attacking team is at least more likely to draw many of those games and still accumulate points. The Visitors, always favouring an attacking style have always come up short in the ACL against teams that can competently defend and also competently attack. If we want to do well in the ACL as well as the HAL then we need to build a more balanced team with a more flexible philosophy

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not sure how signing two of the most attacking full backs alongside two ageing centre backs makes people think we are going to be a defensive team trying to make it hard to be scored against. We'll concede plenty don't worry. We should in theory score more though.  

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not sure how signing two of the most attacking full backs alongside two ageing centre backs makes people think we are going to be a defensive team trying to make it hard to be scored against. We'll concede plenty don't worry. We should in theory score more though.  

Very true. That's more reason to have a very reliable experienced keeper. I would be very wary using last years champions as model for success. I reackon it's more of an exception than the rule about not wasting money on a keeper. Just look at few seasons back with Brisbane Mariners and Wanderers. The visitors just got lucky last season that they didn't get caught too many times due to a weak keeper. They have fixed their keeping problem and if anything they look like being stronger this year because of it.

I definitely think we need another proper striker but not getting Sorensen because we need another striker doesn't make sense. We should do both, but we have probably left it too late again.......    

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Anyone see Perth play last year? high Position in the league based on a lethal striker and easily the best keeper in the league, with 9 muppets making up the numbers. 

The visas are not ideal on paper but we need to see them on the field to see what we actually have. As someone pointed out, the perfect player doesn't come to the A League under the cap.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Anyone see Perth play last year? high Position in the league based on a lethal striker and easily the best keeper in the league, with 9 muppets making up the numbers. 

The visas are not ideal on paper but we need to see them on the field to see what we actually have. As someone pointed out, the perfect player doesn't come to the A League under the cap.

gotta disagree with you a touch there.  most of their players were pretty decent, just they played a shite counter attacking long ball style - something that made their lead striker look a mile better than the rest of the playing squad.

Thwaite, Djubic, Zadokovich, Maclaren and Garcia all can play a bit (even if a few of them are a pack of dogs) and would make it into most teams starting 11 (or very close to doing so)..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • jw1739 pinned this topic

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...