kingofhearts Posted August 12, 2013 Report Share Posted August 12, 2013 Kalmar is a fkn gun, so good on the ball, the best player we probably have on the ball.... He is what i like to call a good a league player, you know what you will get with him What kalmar have you been watching? The guy is a turnover machine and gets pushed off the ball way too easy. A very average player Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nate Posted August 12, 2013 Report Share Posted August 12, 2013 Kalmar is a fkn gun, so good on the ball, the best player we probably have on the ball.... He is what i like to call a good a league player, you know what you will get with him What kalmar have you been watching? The guy is a turnover machine and gets pushed off the ball way too easy. A very average player He's been so inconsistent but on his day, he's far better than average imo. Can dribble, shoot, head and has got height, strength and skills, just lacks stamina and passing range but hopefully he can rectify that before game 1! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MPM Posted August 13, 2013 Report Share Posted August 13, 2013 Kalmar is a gun on his day, but he is very inconsistent and for that reason I don't think he is in our best 11 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Red or Dead Posted August 13, 2013 Report Share Posted August 13, 2013 Based on our contracted players who will be our dedicated: 1. free-kick taker? 2. Corner taker? Kewell, Golgol, Kalmar, Engelaar and/or Mate? Definitely won't be Williams! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jimmy Posted August 13, 2013 Report Share Posted August 13, 2013 From what I've seen: Gol>Kewell>Engeelar>Kalmar>Duga>Willo Who would people want to take penalties? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Luke Posted August 13, 2013 Report Share Posted August 13, 2013 Kalmar is a fkn gun, so good on the ball, the best player we probably have on the ball.... He is what i like to call a good a league player, you know what you will get with him Yeh 1 decent game and 5 rubbish ones 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Torn Asunder Posted August 13, 2013 Author Report Share Posted August 13, 2013 Make or break year for Kalmar. His blinder last year was fantastic but in that game I tend to recall that we had one extra midfielder, based on the formation of the opposing team and NK was not really closed down. The match after he was given very little time and space and he struggled. No doubt the club hold him in high regard given his appearance on the clubs promotional stuff, however I don't think he is a starter in our best 11. For Nicky to be around next season, when his chance comes he must take it and hold on like his life depends on it! I like the kid and I hope he does well Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baresi Posted August 13, 2013 Report Share Posted August 13, 2013 You're all forgetting how good Kalmar was in season one... Took a lot of people by surprise for how much he could impact a game. Creative, strong, powerful, and classy. Yes, he has been horribly inconsistent, and has had some pretty serious injuries, but he has shown enough promise to suggest he will be a handy player at the very least. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cadete Posted August 13, 2013 Report Share Posted August 13, 2013 You're all forgetting how good Kalmar was in season one... Took a lot of people by surprise for how much he could impact a game. Creative, strong, powerful, and classy. Yes, he has been horribly inconsistent, and has had some pretty serious injuries, but he has shown enough promise to suggest he will be a handy player at the very least. A very good bench player - But IMO opinion if he was going to be a Top Four side's Number 10 then he would have shown more consistency by now. I think Kewell could do some pretty impressive things as our Number 10. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hakz7 Posted August 13, 2013 Report Share Posted August 13, 2013 (edited) From what I've seen: Gol>Kewell>Engeelar>Kalmar>Duga>Willo Who would people want to take penalties?I'd want Golgol to take them but Kewell would most likely be the first choice. And I hope his first goal won't come from one. Edited August 13, 2013 by hakz7 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RoyalHeart Posted August 13, 2013 Report Share Posted August 13, 2013 Do you guys think that if we didn't get a striker it would be a disaster? Would you be happy to have Gol gol/McAllistair/Williams/Kewell as our front man options? I read on twitter that Billy K has headed across to Abu Dhabi so doesn't look like he has earned a contract..... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baresi Posted August 13, 2013 Report Share Posted August 13, 2013 You're all forgetting how good Kalmar was in season one... Took a lot of people by surprise for how much he could impact a game. Creative, strong, powerful, and classy. Yes, he has been horribly inconsistent, and has had some pretty serious injuries, but he has shown enough promise to suggest he will be a handy player at the very least. A very good bench player - But IMO opinion if he was going to be a Top Four side's Number 10 then he would have shown more consistency by now. I think Kewell could do some pretty impressive things as our Number 10. He's much more of a creative central midfielder than he is a number 10, though. And that's one of the biggest issues; the coaching staff plays him wrongly, and people don't see what his playing style actually is. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tbitm Posted August 13, 2013 Report Share Posted August 13, 2013 interesting that he's gone to Abu Dhabi, perhaps that means we are in serious talks with a striker atm Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HeartinHobart Posted August 13, 2013 Report Share Posted August 13, 2013 I'd want Golgol to take them but Kewell would most likely be the first choice. And I hope his first goal won't come from one. Don't care how he scores his first goal. As long as its round 1! :-) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Petercrouch Posted August 13, 2013 Report Share Posted August 13, 2013 would be a mad troll if redders took a penno against the mongs tbh Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cadete Posted August 13, 2013 Report Share Posted August 13, 2013 You're all forgetting how good Kalmar was in season one... Took a lot of people by surprise for how much he could impact a game. Creative, strong, powerful, and classy. Yes, he has been horribly inconsistent, and has had some pretty serious injuries, but he has shown enough promise to suggest he will be a handy player at the very least. A very good bench player - But IMO opinion if he was going to be a Top Four side's Number 10 then he would have shown more consistency by now. I think Kewell could do some pretty impressive things as our Number 10. He's much more of a creative central midfielder than he is a number 10, though. And that's one of the biggest issues; the coaching staff plays him wrongly, and people don't see what his playing style actually is. He has a more basic problem than that - Which is his inability to run out games strongly at A League level. (Not a good problem to have at the early to mid point of your career.) 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hakz7 Posted August 13, 2013 Report Share Posted August 13, 2013 I'd want Golgol to take them but Kewell would most likely be the first choice. And I hope his first goal won't come from one. Don't care how he scores his first goal. As long as its round 1! :-)Very true. In that case, he can use his hand to score and I won't care. What I meant was, I hope he can start scoring goals from open play early on rather than waiting for a penalty a few weeks into the season to score his first. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AlexDaGroza Posted August 15, 2013 Report Share Posted August 15, 2013 FFA just announced that teams can have a fifth player on the bench. That being said, how do you guys think it will effect us? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post NuggetsMcGreggor Posted August 15, 2013 Popular Post Report Share Posted August 15, 2013 It will mean we'll be able to have another player on the bench 7 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mus-28 Posted August 15, 2013 Report Share Posted August 15, 2013 Excellent news. The likelyhood of players making the bench because they are versatile instead of for their ability should be reduced. Specifically Hoffman. Would've liked there to be a stipulation that at least 1 substitute had to be Under 21. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Murfy1 Posted August 15, 2013 Report Share Posted August 15, 2013 FFA just announced that teams can have a fifth player on the bench. That being said, how do you guys think it will effect us? I reckon it will help us have another young player on the bench. We'll probably have something like Tando, Vrankovic, Kalmar, Williams/Ramsay/Mebrahtu and now someone else like Garuccio or Mauk. Maybe not always, but I reckon young players like Garuccio and Mauk will make the match day squad more often (especially when we have an injury or two, as well). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dylan Posted August 15, 2013 Report Share Posted August 15, 2013 Richmond game? Walker Weilaert Vranks Behich Duga Kewell Germ Duga Gol Rams Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
theresonlyonebzamora Posted August 15, 2013 Report Share Posted August 15, 2013 Wow dugandzic playing in two positions at once? Cool! 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Red or Dead Posted August 16, 2013 Report Share Posted August 16, 2013 FFA just announced that teams can have a fifth player on the bench. That being said, how do you guys think it will effect us? Fantastic news!! It means now coaches can actually coach with a bit more flexibility...they don't HAVE to have just a defender, midfielder and striker on the bench. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Red or Dead Posted August 16, 2013 Report Share Posted August 16, 2013 Redmayne Walker Gerhardt Weilaart Behich Engelaar Murdocca © Kewell Dugandzic Ramsay Williams Bench: Thando, Vrankovic, Germano, Kalmar, Mebrahtu Challenging for a spot: Garuccio, Mauk, Mitchinson and Macallister (until our star striker is signed) Carrying the oranges: Hoffman Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jw1739 Posted August 17, 2013 Report Share Posted August 17, 2013 (edited) Unfortunately I couldn't make the Richmond game, but based on reports it looks as though things are sorting themselves out a little. At this stage I'm concerned about Germano and Kalmar, neither of whom have put in an appearance so far. Too late now on Velaphi, but God knows why we rushed in to sign him - why not trial him and Bray in these pre-seasons and see how they go? Not impressed with his signing at all. Looks like Ramsay and Williams fighting it out for the LW, with Gucci just waiting to pounce. I think Ramsay is the more complete footballer, so he's my starting pick atm. Gol jostling with Mate on the right - there's not much between these two. I also hope we're going to see our wingers switching more this season - all have got good shots on them so coming inside and going for goal is a good option. In midfield Engelaar as DM of course, with Kewell as AM, and IMO Murdocca just has to be in there; his work-rate is just astonishing. My pick at this stage: Redmayne; Walker, Gerhardt, Wielaert; Behich; Engelaar; Murdocca, Kewell; Mate/GolGol, Visa striker, Ramsay. Edited August 17, 2013 by jw1739 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kingofhearts Posted August 17, 2013 Report Share Posted August 17, 2013 The thing about signing Velaphi is that he is happy to sit on the bench for the entire season. He knows redders is our number 1, and accepts the fact that he'll only play if redders is injured. Bray on the other hand, is definitely the better keeper, but would want to play most weeks,and we just can't give him that. That's why velaphi was signed Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jw1739 Posted August 17, 2013 Report Share Posted August 17, 2013 The thing about signing Velaphi is that he is happy to sit on the bench for the entire season. He knows redders is our number 1, and accepts the fact that he'll only play if redders is injured. Bray on the other hand, is definitely the better keeper, but would want to play most weeks,and we just can't give him that. That's why velaphi was signed I hear what you say. But I've just watched the highlights of last night's game and he made at least three atrocious blunders that could have - should have - cost us goals. If Redders is injured God help us. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mulhollanddrive Posted August 17, 2013 Report Share Posted August 17, 2013 Adjusting my preferred 11: Redmayne Germano Gerhardt Wielaert Behich Murdocca Kewell Engelaar Mebrahtu CF Ramsay Velaphi Vrankovic Kalmar Dugandzic Williams Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
belaguttman Posted August 17, 2013 Report Share Posted August 17, 2013 The thing about signing Velaphi is that he is happy to sit on the bench for the entire season. He knows redders is our number 1, and accepts the fact that he'll only play if redders is injured. Bray on the other hand, is definitely the better keeper, but would want to play most weeks,and we just can't give him that. That's why velaphi was signed It would be better for both Redmayne and Bray to have them pushing each other than a situation where a number 1 knows that he has to seriously fuck up or be in a wheelchair before he's not going to play. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kingofhearts Posted August 17, 2013 Report Share Posted August 17, 2013 The thing about signing Velaphi is that he is happy to sit on the bench for the entire season. He knows redders is our number 1, and accepts the fact that he'll only play if redders is injured. Bray on the other hand, is definitely the better keeper, but would want to play most weeks,and we just can't give him that. That's why velaphi was signed It would be better for both Redmayne and Bray to have them pushing each other than a situation where a number 1 knows that he has to seriously fuck up or be in a wheelchair before he's not going to play. I agree with what you and jw are saying, i'm just giving what i believe the reason is that bray wasn't signed. We don't know what his demands were, money, playing time ext, and we just couldn't guarantee him that. I don't think that one person on here would sign velaphi over bray on talent alone, but there are a lot of different factors we don't know about. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Libero Posted August 17, 2013 Report Share Posted August 17, 2013 Adjusting my preferred 11: Redmayne Germano Gerhardt Wielaert Behich Murdocca Kewell Engelaar Mebrahtu CF Ramsay Velaphi Vrankovic Kalmar Dugandzic Williams surely have Walker ahead of Germano at RB? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mulhollanddrive Posted August 17, 2013 Report Share Posted August 17, 2013 I like Germano in there, but pretty certain Walker will start in round 1. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wombegongal Posted August 17, 2013 Report Share Posted August 17, 2013 On the Bray v Velaphi thing I think the most important thing for Bray to be doing is playing week in and out, I'm pretty syre the club believe this too. He will play every week in the yoof team and will likely be on the bench for the odd senior game where practicable. He could even come in if Redders goes down and tando remains on the bench. I wouldn't stress to much unless Redders goes down. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cadete Posted August 17, 2013 Report Share Posted August 17, 2013 On the Bray v Velaphi thing I think the most important thing for Bray to be doing is playing week in and out, I'm pretty syre the club believe this too. He will play every week in the yoof team and will likely be on the bench for the odd senior game where practicable. He could even come in if Redders goes down and tando remains on the bench. I wouldn't stress to much unless Redders goes down. Finally some sanity - Can u post this in the Sack Thread as well. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dylan Posted August 27, 2013 Report Share Posted August 27, 2013 Well since this has all happend.Based on if best case scenario for Engelaar and we dont manage to get a replacement. I really hope JA throws caution in the wind until Engelaar gets back at least.ReddersWalker Weilaert Vranks BehichMurdocca GerhardtKewellDuga Mebrahtu/McGrath Ramsay.Williams, Kalmar, Mebrahtu/McGrath, Germano, Tando Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LR9 Posted September 9, 2013 Report Share Posted September 9, 2013 We'll, this has drastically improved... RedmayneWalker - Kisnorbo - Weilaert - BehichMurdocca - GerhardtKewellDuganzic - McGrath* - Mebrahtu B: Velaphi, Vrankovic, Kalmar/Germano, Williams, Ramsey *McGrath signing is conditional, but he should be fit to start with 8 weeks of P/S under his belt. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
millm103 Posted September 10, 2013 Report Share Posted September 10, 2013 With a fully fit squad Redmayne Walker - Kisnorbo - Weilaert - Behich Engelaar - Gerhardt Kewell Duganzic - McGrath* - Ramsey Sub: Murdocca- Williams - GolGol - Vrankovic - Tando Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tommykins Posted September 10, 2013 Report Share Posted September 10, 2013 (edited) At the moment I've got it down as something like this. Redmayne Walker - Kisnorbo - Weilaert - Behich Gerhardt - Murdocca Duganzic Kewell Ramsey Macallister (/McGrath/Wonderstriker) Bench: Velaphi, Vrankovic, GolGol, Williams, Germano. If a striker that isn't D-Mac is signed, then I think Macallister drops out of the side entirely. Edited September 10, 2013 by Tommykins Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mus-28 Posted September 10, 2013 Report Share Posted September 10, 2013 Time to adopt the Arsenal Invincibles formation, we've got the ideal players for every position. Redders Walker - Weilaert - Kisnorbo - Behich Germano - Gerhardt - Murdocca Dugandzic Kewell - Gol Gol When in possesion Dugandzic moves inside ala Pires to give Behich (Cole) the touchline to run into, whilst Kewell drops deeper into the hole ala Bergkamp, and they play through balls to the lightning quick striker Gol Gol (Henry). Simples. 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.