Jump to content
Melbourne Football

Vi7it0rs


Ando
 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 3.8k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

haha.

Honestly, it was the least GC deserved. Was almost another case of bad refereeing deciding the result . Leijer should have been sent off, could have had 4 yellows ffs. Don't know why the Free kick, kewell scored off was brought back either, surely the advantage had been taken? The FK was over 5 metres closer to goal than it should have been as well.

Mebrathu should have scored early in the half too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Schip Happens! would like to apologise for a previous post which featured Romani imagery. It has been brought to our attention that this use of imagery may be inappropriate. We would particularly like to apologise for comparing any race of people to Victory supporters.

Schip Happens!

Edited by SchipHappens!!
Link to comment
Share on other sites

No, you are correct. One of the problems in not having a legally binding agreement such as the Bill of Rights. That's why liable, slander and defamation are easily fought and won here.

In saying this the High Court found that the Constitution has implied Human Rights, how they found this is a bit beyond me but they did.

Throughout history the Australian High Court has tended to find a lot of things in the Constitution that are very hard to find.

Anyway we also have other key pieces of legislation that protect Human Rights like the Equal Opportunity Act – We don’t need a Bill of Rights, they can often cause more trouble than they are worth such as the Gun Issue in the States.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Absolutely disagree Cadete. The Bill of Rights has one advantage over any document or implied notions we have in our weakly written constitution. Its tangible. It actually exists and thus can be interpreted on its merits insomuch as it clearly states what is an inalienable right etc.

All our subsequent guarantees of rights etc are based upon good will and implied moral convention. Nothing solid or tangible such as the bill of rights.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Absolutely disagree Cadete. The Bill of Rights has one advantage over any document or implied notions we have in our weakly written constitution. Its tangible. It actually exists and thus can be interpreted on its merits insomuch as it clearly states what is an inalienable right etc.

All our subsequent guarantees of rights etc are based upon good will and implied moral convention. Nothing solid or tangible such as the bill of rights.

I knew you would disagree, its something that we will have to agree to disagree on...

Otherwise I will disowned.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share




×
×
  • Create New...