Jump to content
Melbourne Football

City Football Group (CFG) [Owner of Melbourne City]


Torn Asunder
 Share

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, citypool said:

I don’t think western United will be a successful club I’ll be surprised if they get more fans to Geelong then we do. But if they are successful where does that leave us?

We will be back to season 3 in terms of memberships. We had so much potential and had momentum going until one individual who has single-handedly crushed all of this. 

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, Tony999 said:

We will be back to season 3 in terms of memberships. We had so much potential and had momentum going until one individual who has single-handedly crushed all of this. 

Everything he's done has been either at the behest of, or at the very least has been condoned by, all the line managers above him, right to the top of City Football Group. Otherwise he'd have been stopped. They are all guilty, not just Joyce.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, jw1739 said:

Everything he's done has been either at the behest of, or at the very least has been condoned by, all the line managers above him, right to the top of City Football Group. Otherwise he'd have been stopped. They are all guilty, not just Joyce.

He'd be the main culprit. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, HughJass said:

It's spot on. 'What is the point of Melbourne City?' Poor Yoshi, wondering like the rest of us what he did to deserve this punishment. Loving the dig against Cahill too. But most of all the story of how a small, community club that we all liked got eaten by oil money fuelled human rights abusers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Quote

Melbourne City replaced the Heart with the promise of trophies, but what has been the point?

By Offsiders columnist Richard Hinds

Posted 43 minutes ago

Bruno Fornaroli goes the double fist pump

Full disclosure: we called our family cat Bruno.

Not in honour of the singer Bruno Mars or the preposterously effete Sacha Baron Cohen character.

Bruno is a nod to one of the most optimistic chapters in the A-League's chequered history when Melbourne City's brilliant Uruguayan striker Bruno Fornaroli was scoring for fun — both his and ours.

Fornaroli's sublime finishing was symbolic of what the FFA hoped Melbourne City's vastly wealthy Abu Dhabi owners would bring to the A-League when they bought and instantly re-branded Melbourne Heart in 2014 (besides a truck load of cash).

Selected by the City Group's vast talent identification network and implanted in its Australian franchise, Fornaroli elevated both the club and the competition.

Bruno was an A-League identity. Not merely another big name import like David Villa who turned up for a few hamstring stretching appearances before relocating to the City Groups more glamorous and rewarding franchise in New York.

Then there was the "state of the art" facility Melbourne City built at their Bundoora headquarters which gave the impression City Group money could buy happiness — or at least a much better lap pool than Sydney FC or Brisbane Roar.

So when we called them Melbourne $ity, it wasn't a sledge. It was an attempt to embrace the one significant identifying feature and practical advantage Melbourne's second team had over cross-town rivals Victory and the rest of the competition — guaranteed financial solidarity.

Back then it seemed only a matter of time before the good times rolled. Even a gormless 10-year-old could sense it.

Remember that clever advertising campaign when Yoshi, the A-League Every Child, was given a tour of all the clubs before announcing he had chosen to follow — drum roll — Melbourne City?

So how has that worked out for Yoshi?

Just a month after his decision Yoshi celebrated City's 2016 FFA Cup victory and you were worried he might become the kind of bandwagon-jumping football-spoiled brat who followed Liverpool or Arsenal in their glory days.

But yesterday as Melbourne City coughed up a 2-0 lead and drew 2-2 with league leaders Perth Glory at AAMI Park, you wondered if Yoshi was watching or on the PlayStation.

Fornaroli's predicament symbolic of Melbourne City's current plight

Melbourne City players stand around looking glum.

Before the game it was Fornaroli's sad, drawn-out departure that seemed most symbolic of the current Melbourne City status.

The Uruguayan had emptied his locker during the week after losing a long battle of wills with manager Warren Joyce who, from the little we have been told, was not enraptured by the star striker's work habits.

In justifying Fornaroli's expulsion, Joyce said: "Culture is non-negotiable."

But what is Melbourne City's culture? Why does it even exist? To produce players to send up the City Group chain of command to clubs in foreign leagues or sell for a handy profit?

Former Melbourne City star Aaron Mooy's $10 million transfer to Huddersfield Town recouped most of the $12 million licence fee.

Assuming Melbourne City youth product Daniel Arzani recovers from a serious knee injury, his transfer might pay for the next centre of excellence or add a few lanes to the lap pool. He might even star with Manchester City.

This is good for City Group business. But it is a bloodless existence for those Melbourne City fans craving long-term engagement with stars or, at least, a visible match-day benefit from these transactions.

It also totally misunderstands, you might even say betrays, the initial Melbourne Heart fan base.

Why does my Heart feel so bad?

Watford goalkeeper Heurelho Gomes collides with teammate Molla Wague against Manchester City in the Premier League.

Without a specific geographical location or ethnic base, Heart's crowds included a large element of what you might called football purists and counter-culture types.

Some of these supporters had embraced Melbourne Heart simply because it was not Melbourne Victory as a coffee snob might embrace a local coffee shop because it wasn't Starbucks.

To these fans the takeover of Heart by the City Group and its politically dubious oil sheikh owners wasn't nearly as exciting as it was to the FFA which was elated to find an owner whose cheques didn't bounce like a super ball on a trampoline. (Although the FFA was perhaps less elated a couple of years later when the City Group's local representatives helped weaken its hold on the A-League.)

If Heart fans were to rent their football souls and embrace the Abu Dhabi franchise model, the reward was supposed to be entertaining football and virtually guaranteed success.

Thus they stroked their hipster beards and fantasised about a club that would reinvent Australian football under the brooding tutelage of a suave pony-tailed Armani-clad European coach.

Instead they find themselves enduring the almost comically pragmatic style of the Englishman Joyce whose matchday wardrobe is High St leisurewear and whose tactics come straight from the Harry Redknapp relegation survival playbook.

After Sunday's achingly predictable come-from-ahead draw against Glory, City's remaining redeeming feature is the A-League's generous finals systems that means the fifth placed team in a 10 team league is a notional title contender instead of suffering mid-table mediocrity as it would be in almost any other nation.

That and the five goals in four games (including two against Glory) scored by Socceroo Jamie Maclaren, now the only regular reminder of $ity's powerful connections and initial promise.

But such is the generosity of Australian football's championships system that if Maclaren's form continues into the play-offs we might yet be checking to see if you can change a cat's name by deed poll.

Offsiders with Kelli Underwood airs on ABC TV Sundays at 10:00am.

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2019-03-04/whats-the-point-of-melbourne-city-richard-hinds/10866124

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

59 minutes ago, citypool said:

I’ve reading a lot about cfg seems to be getting a lot of press in the media more 

IMO quite rightly so. It was the final exit of Bruno from City that triggered it.

We are the only previously-existing club in the CFG stable that has been re-branded. It's Soriano's idea, and he's persisting with it, even though the metrics show that it isn't working. Feeder club - yes. Franchise club - no. A franchise club won't work, especially in Australia. The Australian character doesn't take easily to having something rammed down its throat by outsiders. As @Shahanga has said, CFG rolled us over on red-and-white, but it did that because local management was complicit in the change; if Munn and co. had resisted as well then the outcome would have had a better chance of being different. Local management was kept on after the takeover only because Soriano knew they were weak and would roll over.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, Jovan said:

http://theworldgame.sbs.com.au/article/2019/03/05/city-football-group-targeting-investment-india

It's pretty safe to say that by the end of the year we will drop to eighth in the CFG pecking order and won't be long before we are out of the top ten. 

Hopefully they’ll sell us then. 

(And fuck off back to whence they came)

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, haz said:

I'm in the same boat. Can live with one identity change, but another.... I think I'd be time für me to give up the HAL

I'm the opposite. I'd welcome CFG getting out of our picture altogether. And I reckon a return to actually being a Melbourne club for Melbourne people would be a real positive for most. 

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

48 minutes ago, jw1739 said:

I'm the opposite. I'd welcome CFG getting out of our picture altogether. And I reckon a return to actually being a Melbourne club for Melbourne people would be a real positive for most. 

I suspect it's a case of knowing what we then become. Is it a return to red and white and local ownership? Or do we just get acquired by the next international conglomerate and get rebranded again? There are good outcomes which feel emotionally better than where we are right now, and ones which could be a lot worse - Melbourne Evergrande anyone?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, fensaddler said:

I suspect it's a case of knowing what we then become. Is it a return to red and white and local ownership? Or do we just get acquired by the next international conglomerate and get rebranded again? There are good outcomes which feel emotionally better than where we are right now, and ones which could be a lot worse - Melbourne Evergrande anyone?

The other two A-League clubs owned by overseas interests - Brisbane and Newcastle - haven't been re-branded, and AFAIK there hasn't been any push to do so. Central Coast also have a significant investment both by Sheffield United and Mike Charlesworth their Chairman - not sure of the percentage though.

Even within CFG it's only Melbourne Heart that has been re-branded (so far that is).

I'm not against overseas ownership per se. Of course owners will have a say in how a local operation is managed - put parameters around costs and so on - but in our case the blatant micromanagement from Manchester is what hurts. I'd even be prepared to accept a permanent change to incorporate sky blue if there was decent red somewhere to acknowledge Melbourne (and not just in the badge).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, haz said:

I'm in the same boat. Can live with one identity change, but another.... I think I'd be time für me to give up the HAL

If I bought it I’d change the kit to Argentina style and have red highlights. Name stays

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, jw1739 said:

The other two A-League clubs owned by overseas interests - Brisbane and Newcastle - haven't been re-branded, and AFAIK there hasn't been any push to do so. Central Coast also have a significant investment both by Sheffield United and Mike Charlesworth their Chairman - not sure of the percentage though.

Even within CFG it's only Melbourne Heart that has been re-branded (so far that is).

I'm not against overseas ownership per se. Of course owners will have a say in how a local operation is managed - put parameters around costs and so on - but in our case the blatant micromanagement from Manchester is what hurts. I'd even be prepared to accept a permanent change to incorporate sky blue if there was decent red somewhere to acknowledge Melbourne (and not just in the badge).

Absolutely. Football clubs change ownership all the time, but only rarely do they change their identity. There's been a lot of resistance in Europe to the Red Bull model of rebranding a club and quite rightly. Its not worked out great for us either. Red Bull Melbourne would have me walking straight to Western United... 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, HughJass said:

https://www.theage.com.au/sport/soccer/ffa-back-football-victoria-s-plan-for-80-million-home-for-matildas-20190305-p511xw.html

So Latrobe are bidding for it as well which includes a 5k stadium, chance for cfg to partner up and build a 15k seater and base city out of Latrobe permanently? 

5k stadium is bang on perfect. 

Just make sure they include a sausage stand and it's a win win scenario. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, HughJass said:

https://www.theage.com.au/sport/soccer/ffa-back-football-victoria-s-plan-for-80-million-home-for-matildas-20190305-p511xw.html

So Latrobe are bidding for it as well which includes a 5k stadium, chance for cfg to partner up and build a 15k seater and base city out of Latrobe permanently? 

One would hope they would come to the party and make it a 15-k’er.

but I am biased as I am firmly of the opinion the club should start making it the club of the northern suburbs.

City Terrace will be renamed to North Terrace

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My Facebook Memories from 5 years ago came up "Inside scoop - the money and development Man City will put into Melbourne Heart will be bigger than anything Australia has seen in any sport"

This hasn't aged well. At the time I was told by someone high up close to the club that CFG were going to invest 10's of millions into the club. So much promise...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, Deeming said:

My Facebook Memories from 5 years ago came up "Inside scoop - the money and development Man City will put into Melbourne Heart will be bigger than anything Australia has seen in any sport"

This hasn't aged well. At the time I was told by someone high up close to the club that CFG were going to invest 10's of millions into the club. So much promise...

To be fair they probably aren't that far off. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, citypool said:

New York City fc fans seem happy then us judging by their Facebook 

Remember that NYCFC didn't exist until CFG (80%) came along and founded the club with the New York Yankees (20%).

We're the only club in the CFG stable that existed prior to being bought by CFG and then re-branded to look like a clone of Manchester City.

The only one.

And that, IMHO, remains the single biggest obstacle in the way of support and growth of Melbourne City.

  • Thanks 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...