Shahanga Posted April 12, 2016 Report Share Posted April 12, 2016 8 minutes ago, bt50 said: So Group B for us consists of: Australia Japan Saudi Arabia Iraq UAE Thailand Definitely the tougher of the two groups but should progress either way. Looking forward to more classics against Japan Yeah our rivalry with the Blue Samurai is heading towards epic. A positive with this group is that with no "easy wins" each team will take points off the others. My guess is 16 points would see you through and maybe less. (4W4D2L). This time around "The Asian Formula" will work - win at home and draw away. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
strider Posted April 14, 2016 Report Share Posted April 14, 2016 Dont underestimate UAE and Iraq. Saudis are not the threat they once were but Iraq and the UAE have some very well paid players in big leagues. Ali Adnan will molest the Aussie RB whoever he is. That Omar bloke from the UAE will skullfuck Mooy and Jedinak Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tesla Posted April 14, 2016 Author Report Share Posted April 14, 2016 Couldn't have been worse tbh, maybe if we got Uzbekistan instead of Saudi Arabia, but even then Saudi Arabia certainly have the bigger reputation. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Luke Posted April 14, 2016 Report Share Posted April 14, 2016 Both groups are dead even tbh nothing between them Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tesla Posted April 14, 2016 Author Report Share Posted April 14, 2016 (edited) 6 minutes ago, Luke said: Both groups are dead even tbh nothing between them Japan is better than Korea (though we do better against Japan it seems) UAE is way better than Qatar, not even close. Iraq is better than China. Thailand is better than Syria. Edited April 14, 2016 by Tesla Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bt50 Posted April 14, 2016 Report Share Posted April 14, 2016 1 hour ago, Tesla said: Japan is better than Korea (though we do better against Japan it seems) UAE is way better than Qatar, not even close. Iraq is better than China. Thailand is better than Syria. Hmm China could be anything though, most underperforming nation in world football imo. Syria are a bit of an unknown and Saudi away is always tricky, although like most of the middle eastern nations are nearly a guaranteed three points at home. Slightly harder group, not much tho. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shahanga Posted April 14, 2016 Report Share Posted April 14, 2016 7 hours ago, Tesla said: Japan is better than Korea (though we do better against Japan it seems) UAE is way better than Qatar, not even close. Iraq is better than China. Thailand is better than Syria. You're right of course, but who cares? If we are going to do anything as a football nation we need to get past opponents like these (who are decent, but not world beaters). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tesla Posted April 14, 2016 Author Report Share Posted April 14, 2016 42 minutes ago, Shahanga said: You're right of course, but who cares? If we are going to do anything as a football nation we need to get past opponents like these (who are decent, but not world beaters). I think qualifying for the world cup will do more for us as a footballing nation than beating these teams, so obviously the preference is to have as easy a group as possible. We should be okay, but there are a lot of tough away trips there, and if we slip up at home things could get tricky pretty fast. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mattyh001 Posted April 15, 2016 Report Share Posted April 15, 2016 completely disagree about how hard our group is TBH, could have been a shit load harder. not saying we're gonna qualify easily, but glad we missed most of the better form teams from each of the 6 pots. aside from the FIFA ranking system (which is a complete load of shit given (a.) it rewards teams who have played more games, and (b.) gives the same amount of points for drawing 2-2 in a friendly against Germany as opposed to Cuba), you also have the ELO ranking system. the ELO system ranks in accordance with measuring actual result against what was reasonably expected given recent form. admittedly most of the groups are fairly even, but all the same it is pretty interesting in terms of how the Group A teams compare to Group B. the 6 groups go as follows in terms of their world ELO ranking (with our opponents highlighted). Pot 1; Iran 33 v Australia 37 Pot 2: South Korea 19 v Japan 25 Pot 3: Uzbekistan 44 v Saudi Arabia 75 Pot 4: China 71 v UAE 50 Pot 5: Qatar 76 v Iraq 85 Pot 6: Syria 79 v Thailand 104 the standings are as at the end of March, when the last set of games were played. given the travel, there are certainly risks, but thank fuck we missed both the Syrians and the Uzbeks. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tesla Posted April 16, 2016 Author Report Share Posted April 16, 2016 (edited) On 15/04/2016 at 7:51 PM, mattyh001 said: completely disagree about how hard our group is TBH, could have been a shit load harder. not saying we're gonna qualify easily, but glad we missed most of the better form teams from each of the 6 pots. aside from the FIFA ranking system (which is a complete load of shit given (a.) it rewards teams who have played more games, and (b.) gives the same amount of points for drawing 2-2 in a friendly against Germany as opposed to Cuba), you also have the ELO ranking system. the ELO system ranks in accordance with measuring actual result against what was reasonably expected given recent form. admittedly most of the groups are fairly even, but all the same it is pretty interesting in terms of how the Group A teams compare to Group B. the 6 groups go as follows in terms of their world ELO ranking (with our opponents highlighted). Pot 1; Iran 33 v Australia 37 Pot 2: South Korea 19 v Japan 25 Pot 3: Uzbekistan 44 v Saudi Arabia 75 Pot 4: China 71 v UAE 50 Pot 5: Qatar 76 v Iraq 85 Pot 6: Syria 79 v Thailand 104 the standings are as at the end of March, when the last set of games were played. given the travel, there are certainly risks, but thank fuck we missed both the Syrians and the Uzbeks. Both Thailand and Syria have very good recent record, I don't think Syria's is any more impressive. What I think is important from our perspective, when Thailand has played against good teams like South Korea and Cameroon they have only lost those games by 1 goal, whereas when Syria played against Japan twice it lost by quite a few goals. It shows Thailand can be competitive against a significantly better team like Australia, whereas Syria probably can't. Also worth noting, Syria are obviously not playing their home games in Syria at the moment, while it won't exactly be a neutral venue, it still won't be a full home advantage for the Syrians, and away games are the biggest worry. So I'd take Syria over Thailand for sure. As I said Uzbekistan is probably better than Saudi Arabia at the moment, but since the problem is away games, Saudi Arabia could be just as hard if not harder as an away game than Uzbekistan. Edited April 16, 2016 by Tesla Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mattyh001 Posted April 17, 2016 Report Share Posted April 17, 2016 (edited) 13 hours ago, Tesla said: Both Thailand and Syria have very good recent record, I don't think Syria's is any more impressive. What I think is important from our perspective, when Thailand has played against good teams like South Korea and Cameroon they have only lost those games by 1 goal, whereas when Syria played against Japan twice it lost by quite a few goals. It shows Thailand can be competitive against a significantly better team like Australia, whereas Syria probably can't. Also worth noting, Syria are obviously not playing their home games in Syria at the moment, while it won't exactly be a neutral venue, it still won't be a full home advantage for the Syrians, and away games are the biggest worry. So I'd take Syria over Thailand for sure. As I said Uzbekistan is probably better than Saudi Arabia at the moment, but since the problem is away games, Saudi Arabia could be just as hard if not harder as an away game than Uzbekistan. Overall where the ELO system gives it's greatest benefit is that it contextualises a teams performance / form across a range of games and locations. That is to say it helps takes out all the odd or strange events. In other words when you look at a team like Thailand, you measure the odd decent performance against Japan with the fact that Thailand play like shit against Middle Eastern sides (both home and away). Which says to me they are no better than a Middle Eastern side, and if anything will be like those Socceroos games in the past where opponent sets out to stifle the Socceroos (which would be an underlying factor in the 'form' of Thailand against Japan). I do agree about the fact the Syrians struggling against the bigger teams, but (and as per the same context as Thailand) Syria have proven capable against most in Asia. Where I still remain cautious against teams like Syria is for the same reasons you highlight the Socceroos difficulties in playing in the Middle East. True, Syria play their games on neutral territory. But you are forgetting the impact of representing your country on morale, having an escape, etc, when you country is in a time of conflict. Think back to Iraq a decade ago. Some players might have had some talent but it's not like the bulk of those Iraqi players ever went on with it to playat a higher level. Playing at an international level has an impact. As for the Saudis and Uzbek's, we saw at the Asian Cup (not that long ago) the Uzbek's were the better side and push the Koreans hard. I can't see the problem being home games. Like you, the problem that I see is away. And given how inept the Saudis are overall on the bigger stage, I think the risk will be more that the Socceroos under perform (for which it doesn't really matter who you play) Edited April 17, 2016 by mattyh001 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mus-28 Posted May 27, 2016 Report Share Posted May 27, 2016 After that safe to say we learnt a few more things. Risdon is as suited to international football as much as Maycon was to A-League Smith & Sainsbury are the only walk up starters in defence. Luongo is living on borrowed time, too unfit, too greedy, too many chances We lack any threat from a striker, better to stick to the 4-3-3 and use Kruse and Leckie's pace on the wings to unlock defences. The 4-4-2 Diamond gave us a lot of possession, but we didn't have a striker making clinical runs or able to hold up and lay off. Can we naturalize Bruno within the next month or so Despite the loss things look promising with Sainsbury, Leckie and Cahill to return. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nate Posted May 27, 2016 Report Share Posted May 27, 2016 So we finally found a decent long-term left back in Smith, but now we're severely out of depth on the right side as Risdon was woeful, Franjic hasn't been good for a few years, McGowan is serviceable but too slow, and Degenek while promising was played out of position and seems a little raw. I really liked Milligan as a centre half, and I think he brings too much to the team to drop him. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
n i k o Posted May 27, 2016 Report Share Posted May 27, 2016 2 hours ago, mus-28 said: After that safe to say we learnt a few more things. Risdon is as suited to international football as much as Maycon was to A-League Smith & Sainsbury are the only walk up starters in defence. Luongo is living on borrowed time, too unfit, too greedy, too many chances We lack any threat from a striker, better to stick to the 4-3-3 and use Kruse and Leckie's pace on the wings to unlock defences. The 4-4-2 Diamond gave us a lot of possession, but we didn't have a striker making clinical runs or able to hold up and lay off. Can we naturalize Bruno within the next month or so Despite the loss things look promising with Sainsbury, Leckie and Cahill to return. Goal.com doesn't agree with you... http://m.goal.com/s/en/match/england-vs-australia/2214944/ratings?ICID=MP_MS_6&utm_referrer=http%3A%2F%2Fau.fourfourtwo.com%2Fforums%2Fdefault.aspx%3Fg%3Dposts%26t%3D114654%26p%3D26 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mus-28 Posted May 27, 2016 Report Share Posted May 27, 2016 WOW. The bloke who done those ratings needs to follow another sport, Risdon best on, Mooy 1.5 stars. Pretty much sums up goal.com in one article, fucking shit. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dylan Posted May 28, 2016 Report Share Posted May 28, 2016 19 minutes ago, n i k o said: Goal.com doesn't agree with you... http://m.goal.com/s/en/match/england-vs-australia/2214944/ratings?ICID=MP_MS_6&utm_referrer=http%3A%2F%2Fau.fourfourtwo.com%2Fforums%2Fdefault.aspx%3Fg%3Dposts%26t%3D114654%26p%3D26 Looks like he is one of those guys who thinks the best players are the ones who run a lot. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shahanga Posted May 28, 2016 Report Share Posted May 28, 2016 8 hours ago, mus-28 said: After that safe to say we learnt a few more things. Risdon is as suited to international football as much as Maycon was to A-League Smith & Sainsbury are the only walk up starters in defence. Luongo is living on borrowed time, too unfit, too greedy, too many chances We lack any threat from a striker, better to stick to the 4-3-3 and use Kruse and Leckie's pace on the wings to unlock defences. The 4-4-2 Diamond gave us a lot of possession, but we didn't have a striker making clinical runs or able to hold up and lay off. Can we naturalize Bruno within the next month or so Despite the loss things look promising with Sainsbury, Leckie and Cahill to return. Out of likes. 10/10 analysis mus. we were the better side generally but lost because we had only 1 central defender, a right back who was light years out of his depth and no threat up front (McLaren was invisible). Luongo was poor but the other midfielders carried him. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tesla Posted June 2, 2016 Author Report Share Posted June 2, 2016 (edited) On 28/05/2016 at 9:45 AM, Nate said: So we finally found a decent long-term left back in Smith, but now we're severely out of depth on the right side as Risdon was woeful, Franjic hasn't been good for a few years, McGowan is serviceable but too slow, and Degenek while promising was played out of position and seems a little raw. It's been obvious for a couple years now that right back is a bigger problem than left back. All of a sudden Davidson, Behich, and potentially Brad Smith, emerged at the same time and we went from nothing to a number of options at left back. Then it got a bit iffy with Davidson and Behich perhaps going backwards at club level, and It looked like Smith was heading to obscurity and that he was just another over-hyped youth, but Smith out of no where re-emerged and started even getting games at Liverpool, meanwhile Gersbach has also appeared on the scene and Behich is doing better at club level. It's a position we have very good depth in now, especially if Davidson moves clubs. While right back has been quite dodgy that whole time. Franjic was the weakest first 11 player, and seemingly few other options. And no one else has come through in recent times. But there are some younger players around who could emerge in the next couple years. Edited June 2, 2016 by Tesla Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shahanga Posted June 3, 2016 Report Share Posted June 3, 2016 18 hours ago, Tesla said: It's been obvious for a couple years now that right back is a bigger problem than left back. All of a sudden Davidson, Behich, and potentially Brad Smith, emerged at the same time and we went from nothing to a number of options at left back. Then it got a bit iffy with Davidson and Behich perhaps going backwards at club level, and It looked like Smith was heading to obscurity and that he was just another over-hyped youth, but Smith out of no where re-emerged and started even getting games at Liverpool, meanwhile Gersbach has also appeared on the scene and Behich is doing better at club level. It's a position we have very good depth in now, especially if Davidson moves clubs. While right back has been quite dodgy that whole time. Franjic was the weakest first 11 player, and seemingly few other options. And no one else has come through in recent times. But there are some younger players around who could emerge in the next couple years. YeAh James Meredith too. Great debut but unsighted since. Whereas right now, you are an Aussie and can spell "right back", Ange is thinking about giving you a game. I mean Risdon - he's well short of the mark. The way things are looking right now we'll be playing a left back on the right. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tesla Posted June 3, 2016 Author Report Share Posted June 3, 2016 36 minutes ago, Shahanga said: YeAh James Meredith too. Great debut but unsighted since. Whereas right now, you are an Aussie and can spell "right back", Ange is thinking about giving you a game. I mean Risdon - he's well short of the mark. The way things are looking right now we'll be playing a left back on the right. Deploy Behich as an inverted wing back Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mus-28 Posted June 3, 2016 Report Share Posted June 3, 2016 Degenek showed more in his brief cameo than any other right back has in the past 18 months. Other than moving Milligan out there we don't really have a lot with any quality or potential. The fact Geria is in the squad shows how pathetic our stocks are. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Grimey Posted June 15, 2016 Report Share Posted June 15, 2016 Can get a return flight to Perth for $238 for the first match vs Iraq Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shahanga Posted July 24, 2016 Report Share Posted July 24, 2016 Brad Smith off to Bournemouth for what is being reported as a 6M pound deal. Sorry to see him leave, but for that money Bournemouth are surely thinking "starting XI", so he should get plenty of game time. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thisphantomfortress Posted July 25, 2016 Report Share Posted July 25, 2016 23 hours ago, Shahanga said: Brad Smith off to Bournemouth for what is being reported as a 6M pound deal. Sorry to see him leave, but for that money Bournemouth are surely thinking "starting XI", so he should get plenty of game time. Good move for mine, game time has been shown to be key for Ange. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tesla Posted July 25, 2016 Author Report Share Posted July 25, 2016 This is an excellent move. Frankly, I am quite surprised by it. I would agree that it's most likely a move with the aim of him being a first 11 player (though the new TV deal means 6 mil pounds isnt a lot even for smaller clubs so might not be) 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tesla Posted August 29, 2016 Author Report Share Posted August 29, 2016 What happened to Australia's left back weakness? 4 Aussie leftbacks played 90 mins in Europe over the weekend, and another one is just an injury/suspension/rotation away from 90 mins in the premier league. Perfect example of why you should never worry too much about a perceived weakness in a NT, it never lasts long. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jovan Posted August 29, 2016 Report Share Posted August 29, 2016 22 minutes ago, Tesla said: What happened to Australia's left back weakness? 4 Aussie leftbacks played 90 mins in Europe over the weekend, and another one is just an injury/suspension/rotation away from 90 mins in the premier league. Perfect example of why you should never worry too much about a perceived weakness in a NT, it never lasts long. How many quality #9 are floating about. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thisphantomfortress Posted August 30, 2016 Report Share Posted August 30, 2016 21 hours ago, Jovan said: How many quality #9 are floating about. We will keep stealing Greeks until we find one that works. Simple Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nate Posted August 30, 2016 Report Share Posted August 30, 2016 21 hours ago, Jovan said: How many quality #9 are floating about. from all reports Tomi Juric is going really well atm but yeah, other than that there isn't a great deal. Maclaren's got the most potential imo and maybe Taggart if he gets back into form this season. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jovan Posted August 30, 2016 Report Share Posted August 30, 2016 47 minutes ago, Nate said: from all reports Tomi Juric is going really well atm but yeah, other than that there isn't a great deal. Maclaren's got the most potential imo and maybe Taggart if he gets back into form this season. It's been our problem for years maybe since Viduka. We have produced quality wide players,midfielders and defenders and I can't think of a time when we've had a poor keeper. (I got back to the early 80s ) but as far a genuine strikers Kosmina, Graham Arnold at a stretch but Viduka was genuine player. Having said all that our man Timmy has the all time record but for me he is not a #9. So really our next top class #9 is probably still in high school at the moment. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mulhollanddrive Posted September 1, 2016 Report Share Posted September 1, 2016 Japan lost to UAE at home. Not sure if that's a good thing or not. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thisphantomfortress Posted September 1, 2016 Report Share Posted September 1, 2016 5 minutes ago, mulhollanddrive said: Japan lost to UAE at home. Not sure if that's a good thing or not. Direct rivals losing = good 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nate Posted September 1, 2016 Report Share Posted September 1, 2016 great result, terrible performance. Milligan, Mooy, Luongo and Juric probably the only ones that stood out whilst everyone else was pretty shit. Also, when is Robbie Kruse gonna actually be good? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bt50 Posted September 1, 2016 Report Share Posted September 1, 2016 9 hours ago, thisphantomfortress said: Direct rivals losing = good Except that now UAE are also direct rivals. Nicking a point on Tuesday would be a massive step toward qualification Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mattyh001 Posted September 2, 2016 Report Share Posted September 2, 2016 Generally a good thing particularly since a home loss for Japan, but counts for little if we lose / get smashed Tuesday Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
n i k o Posted September 6, 2016 Report Share Posted September 6, 2016 Anyone staying up to watch us play UAE? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
carlings Posted September 6, 2016 Report Share Posted September 6, 2016 54 minutes ago, n i k o said: Anyone staying up to watch us play UAE? I'm up but working, so only live updates for me. No surprises in the starting XI Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thrillhouse Posted September 6, 2016 Report Share Posted September 6, 2016 fucking boring Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nate Posted September 6, 2016 Report Share Posted September 6, 2016 we're outplaying them but yet again we're lacking quality up front, whereas all the UAE need is one Abdulrahman moment of magic to unlock our defence (as we saw in the first 15 mins) I think it's Timmy time Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
n i k o Posted September 6, 2016 Report Share Posted September 6, 2016 What a cross. Tiimmmyyyy!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.