1) There current proposal does not protect individuals or businesses from disagreeing with same-sex marriage should it be implemented. We will see what has been seen around the world, individuals taken to court over their views.
2) Changing the definition of a word and concept just because someone wants to, is no way for society to function. A simple example, while we might prefer people call ‘soccer’ ‘football’ we have no right to force others to change their definition of ‘football’ to match ours.
3) Its not ‘marriage equity’, if it was, then everyone should be free to define marriage to reflect whatever they want. E.g. polygamy should be allowed. Not that I’m promoting polygamy, just pointing out how the left manipulate language to skew the debate in their direction.